Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Pathway of Blood Flow Through Heart Video Project rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Pathway of Blood Flow Through Heart Video Project
Pathway of the Heart
Students will complete a sidewalk chalk activity to demonstrate the blood flow through the heart.
Rubric Code:
H2WAB45
By
purcelle1
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Nursing
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Pathway of Blood Flow Through Heart Video Project
Excellent
4 pts
Good
3 pts
Fair
2 pts
Poor
1 pts
Accuracy
Excellent
All structures are correctly labeled, and blood pathway is easily identifiable and oxygen vs. deoxygenated blood is distinguishable. Structures that should be labeled: superior and inferior vena cava, right atrium, tricuspid valve, right ventricle, pulmonary valve, pulmonary artery, lungs, pulmonary vein, left atrium, mitral (bicuspid) valve, left ventricle, aortic valve, aorta, body
Good
75% of structures are correctly labeled, and blood pathway is easily identifiable and oxygen vs. deoxygenated blood is distinguishable.
Fair
50% of structures are correctly labeled, and blood pathway is easily identifiable and oxygen vs. deoxygenated blood is distinguishable.
Poor
Less than 50% of structures are correctly labeled, and blood pathway is easily identifiable and and oxygen vs. deoxygenated blood is distinguishable.
Creativity
Excellent
Different colors are used to differentiate oxygen vs. deoxygenated blood, structures of the heart are well drawn and easily identifiable.
Good
Most of the structures of the heart and blood flow are colorful and well drawn and easily identifiable.
Fair
Most of the structures of the heart and blood flow are colorful and well drawn and easily identifiable.
Poor
Only 1 color used and structures are difficult to distinguish.
Video
Excellent
The video is complete and/or done professionally. All group members are engaged. Students use clear and loud voices and correct, precise pronunciation of terms so that all audience members can hear the video. Video is uploaded to google classroom.
Good
The video is mostly complete and/or mostly done professionally. Most group members are engaged. Students use mostly clear and moderately loud voices. Students pronounce most words correctly. Most audience members can hear video.Video is uploaded to google classroom.
Fair
Some of the video is complete and/or is somewhat done professionally. Some members of the group are engaged. Students voices are somewhat clear and low. Students pronounce some words correctly. Audience members have difficulty hearing presentation. Some audience members can hear video. Video is uploaded to google classroom.
Poor
The video is not complete and/or done professionally. None of the members of the group are engaged. Students are not clear at all and speak extremely low. Almost all terms are pronounced incorrectly. Audience members cannot hear the video at all. The video is not uploaded to google classroom.
Team Work
Excellent
All members of the group are equally contributing to completing the project and remained on task throughout class time given.
Good
Most of members of the group are equally contributing to completing the project and remained on task throughout class time given.
Fair
Some members of the group are equally contributing to completing the project and remained on task throughout class time given.
Poor
None of members of the group are equally contributing to completing the project and remained on task throughout class time given.
Use of Class Time
Excellent
Students stayed on task and actively involved in work. Required no teacher intervention with problem-solving, leadership skills, and staying on task.
Good
Students stayed on task and actively involved in work most of the time. Required minimal teacher intervention with problem-solving, leadership skills, and staying on task.
Fair
Students stayed on task and actively involved in work some of the time. Required some teacher intervention with problem-solving, leadership skills, and staying on task. .
Poor
Students never stayed on task. Showed little enthusiasm towards work. Required constant teacher intervention with problem-solving, leadership skills, and staying on task.
Subjects:
Health
Nursing
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Health rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.