Skip to main content
iRubric: Pathway of Blood Flow Through Heart Video Project rubric

iRubric: Pathway of Blood Flow Through Heart Video Project rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Pathway of Blood Flow Through Heart Video Project 
Students will complete a sidewalk chalk activity to demonstrate the blood flow through the heart.
Rubric Code: H2WAB45
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Nursing  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Pathway of Blood Flow Through Heart Video Project
  Excellent

4 pts

Good

3 pts

Fair

2 pts

Poor

1 pts

Accuracy

Excellent

All structures are correctly labeled, and blood pathway is easily identifiable and oxygen vs. deoxygenated blood is distinguishable. Structures that should be labeled: superior and inferior vena cava, right atrium, tricuspid valve, right ventricle, pulmonary valve, pulmonary artery, lungs, pulmonary vein, left atrium, mitral (bicuspid) valve, left ventricle, aortic valve, aorta, body
Good

75% of structures are correctly labeled, and blood pathway is easily identifiable and oxygen vs. deoxygenated blood is distinguishable.
Fair

50% of structures are correctly labeled, and blood pathway is easily identifiable and oxygen vs. deoxygenated blood is distinguishable.
Poor

Less than 50% of structures are correctly labeled, and blood pathway is easily identifiable and and oxygen vs. deoxygenated blood is distinguishable.
Creativity

Excellent

Different colors are used to differentiate oxygen vs. deoxygenated blood, structures of the heart are well drawn and easily identifiable.
Good

Most of the structures of the heart and blood flow are colorful and well drawn and easily identifiable.
Fair

Most of the structures of the heart and blood flow are colorful and well drawn and easily identifiable.
Poor

Only 1 color used and structures are difficult to distinguish.
Video

Excellent

The video is complete and/or done professionally. All group members are engaged. Students use clear and loud voices and correct, precise pronunciation of terms so that all audience members can hear the video. Video is uploaded to google classroom.
Good

The video is mostly complete and/or mostly done professionally. Most group members are engaged. Students use mostly clear and moderately loud voices. Students pronounce most words correctly. Most audience members can hear video.Video is uploaded to google classroom.
Fair

Some of the video is complete and/or is somewhat done professionally. Some members of the group are engaged. Students voices are somewhat clear and low. Students pronounce some words correctly. Audience members have difficulty hearing presentation. Some audience members can hear video. Video is uploaded to google classroom.
Poor

The video is not complete and/or done professionally. None of the members of the group are engaged. Students are not clear at all and speak extremely low. Almost all terms are pronounced incorrectly. Audience members cannot hear the video at all. The video is not uploaded to google classroom.
Team Work

Excellent

All members of the group are equally contributing to completing the project and remained on task throughout class time given.
Good

Most of members of the group are equally contributing to completing the project and remained on task throughout class time given.
Fair

Some members of the group are equally contributing to completing the project and remained on task throughout class time given.
Poor

None of members of the group are equally contributing to completing the project and remained on task throughout class time given.
Use of Class Time

Excellent

Students stayed on task and actively involved in work. Required no teacher intervention with problem-solving, leadership skills, and staying on task.
Good

Students stayed on task and actively involved in work most of the time. Required minimal teacher intervention with problem-solving, leadership skills, and staying on task.
Fair

Students stayed on task and actively involved in work some of the time. Required some teacher intervention with problem-solving, leadership skills, and staying on task. .
Poor

Students never stayed on task. Showed little enthusiasm towards work. Required constant teacher intervention with problem-solving, leadership skills, and staying on task.





Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98