Skip to main content
iRubric: AI Robot Design (Surface Area & Volume) rubric

iRubric: AI Robot Design (Surface Area & Volume) rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
AI Robot Design (Surface Area & Volume) 
This rubric is designed to assess the end design of the team's robot as well as the pitch to investors in the vertical of the robot's designed purpose.
Rubric Code: H245C2B
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Math  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric AI Robot Design Rubric
  Needs Improvement

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Innovative Design

Needs Improvement

Design, intended purpose and structure are standard.

Unfinished strategy for designed purpose.
Fair

Design, intended purpose and structure are developing.

Unique/creative strategy for designed purpose.
Good

Design, intended purpose and structure are above standards


Concretely unique/creative strategy for designed purpose.
Excellent

Design, intended purpose and structure are exceptional.


Extremely unique/creative strategy for designed purpose.
Strategy, Process, Problem-Solving

Needs Improvement

Uses standard design.

No design process (from initial concept through build, test, refinement) communicated.

Strategy based only on ease of task - did not maximize time or learning outcomes for this PBL.
Fair

Some forethought in initial design.

Refinement of robot and programs not communicated.

Strategy often based on ease of task -few risks taken.

Some consideration of time and learning outcomes for this PBL.
Good

Basic understanding of design process, evidence of conceptual planning, building, testing, refining of robot, manipulators, programs.

Effective strategic planning, and aligning with the given learning outcomes for this PBL.
Excellent

Communicates complete design process, from initial concept through build, test, and refinement.

Excellent/innovative strategy as well as full alignment with the given learning outcomes for this PBL.
Project Preparation/Productivity

Needs Improvement

Student did not use time is class to complete the project or project was late.
Fair

Student used a fair amount of their time in class to work on their project.
Good

Student used most of their time in class to work on their project.
Excellent

Student used all class time to complete their project efficiently and optimized the various elements needed to exceed expectations.
Presentation

Needs Improvement

Not enough preparation was done for the presentation of the information, it therefore lacks many elements of what is expected.
Fair

The information presented is not clearly displayed throughout the project.
Good

The student presents the information fairly clearly and displays a reasonable understanding of their information.
Excellent

The student presents the information clearly and displays a complete understanding of their information. It is evident that the student was well prepared.
Pricing/Vertical

Needs Improvement

Price is mentioned but does not make sense for the group this group is targeting.

Does not align with the intended purpose or audience.
Fair

Price makes sense generally to the intended demographic, but margins are not mentioned or do not align with a consumer purchasing.

Partially aligned with the intended purpose and audience.
Good

Price makes sense to the intended audience + margins are aligned with the intention of selling to consumers.

Mostly aligned with the intended purpose and audience.
Excellent

Price and Margins make sense and it is a viable product to sell.

Fully aligned with the intended purpose and audience.
Mathematical Formulas (SA + Volume)

Needs Improvement

Student attempted computation but it is inaccurate. Incorrect formulas used for computation.
Fair

Accurate formulas used but mistakes in computation. Some errors present.
Good

Accurate formulas used. Minor calculation errors present.
Excellent

Accurate formulas used and no mistakes in computation.
Overall End Design

Needs Improvement

Robot lacks most critical design components: surface area/volume not to scale or a clean end design, stays together, efficient parts use, attachments easy to add/remove, simpler than comparable robots.

Few components work together; few components look like they belong together.
Fair

Robot lacks many critical design components: surface area/volume partially to scale with a somewhat clean end design, stays together, efficient parts use, attachments easy to add/remove, simpler than comparable robots.

Some components work together; some components look like they belong together.
Good

Robot lacks some critical design components: surface area/volume mostly to scale with a clean end design, stays together, efficient parts use attachments easy to add/remove, simpler than comparable robots.

Most components work together; most components look like they belong together.
Excellent

Robot is elegant, complete end design that is both clean and polished that aligns with the pitch to an investor.

All components work well together.

All components look like they blend together seamlessly.



Keywords:
  • Robot Design


Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98