Skip to main content
iRubric: Evaluation for Prospective Curriculum rubric

iRubric: Evaluation for Prospective Curriculum rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Evaluation for Prospective Curriculum 
Curriculum Design /Analysis Rubric
Curriculum Evaluation
Rubric Code: H226868
By ksilvia
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: (Other)  
Grade Levels: K-5, Graduate

Powered by iRubric Curriculum Design
  Exceeds Expectations

3 pts

Meets Expectations

2 pts

Needs Improvement

1 pts

Unacceptable

0 pts

Content Standards
5 pts

TEKS and Foundational Literacy Concepts
Exceeds Expectations

The curriculum has direct explicit connections to appropriate grade level and to the content standards (TEKS). Contains all applicable literacy strands: phonemic awareness (K-1), phonics (K-3), Fluency, Vocabulary, Comprehension, and Writing.
Meets Expectations

The curriculum has some connections to appropriate grade level and to the content standards (TEKS). Contains most applicable literacy strands: phonemic awareness (K-1), phonics (K-3), Fluency, Vocabulary, Comprehension, and Writing.
Needs Improvement

It is unclear whether the curriculum is grade appropriate and/or explicitly connected to the standards. Contains some applicable literacy strands: phonemic awareness (K-1), phonics (K-3), Fluency, Vocabulary, Comprehension, and Writing.
Unacceptable

It is clear that the curriculum is not age appropriate and/or tied to the standards.
Biblical Worldview Integration
10 pts

Seamless integration of a Biblical Worldview.
Exceeds Expectations

There is strong evidence of biblical worldview integration throughout the unit. Integration is explicitly stated.
Meets Expectations

There is some evidence of biblical worldview integration, and it is explicitly stated.
Needs Improvement

There is some evidence of biblical worldview integration, but it is not explicitly stated.
Unacceptable

There is poor or no evidence of biblical worldview integration.
Instructional Diversity
5 pts

The curriculum is academically and socially student- centered.
Exceeds Expectations

There is strong evidence that instructional strategies are based on student goals, are learner centered and inclusive of of learner styles. The content clearly reflects the diversity of students attending our school.
Meets Expectations

There is some evidence that instructional strategies are based on student goals, are learner centered and inclusive of learner styles. The content mostly reflects the diversity of students attending our school.
Needs Improvement

There is little evidence that instructional strategies are based on student goals, are learner centered and inclusive of learner styles. The content somewhat reflects the diversity of students attending our school.
Unacceptable

There is no evidence that instructional strategies are based on student goals, are learner centered and inclusive of learner styles. The content does not reflect the diversity of students attending our school.
Teacher Resources & Support
5 pts

Includes quality resources for teacher collaboration and lesson planning.
Exceeds Expectations

All of the additional/ supplemental resources are provided. They are relevant to the curriculum and cross-curricular when appropriate. The resources are rich, varied, and age/skill appropriate. Thorough daily lesson planning tools are provided.
Meets Expectations

Most of the additional/ supplemental resources are provided. They are relevant to the curriculum and cross-curricular when appropriate. Most of the resources are rich, varied, and age/skill appropriate. Daily lesson planning tools are provided.
Needs Improvement

Some of the additional/ supplemental resources are provided. They are relevant to the curriculum but may not be cross-curricular. The resources may be rich, varied, or age/skill appropriate. Suggestions for lesson planning are provided.
Unacceptable

None of the additional/ supplemental resources are provided. No lesson planning tools are provided.
Differentiation
5 pts

Addresses the needs of struggling, on level, and above level learners.
Exceeds Expectations

Addresses the needs of struggling, on level, and above level learners through providing leveled readers and small group/ intervention lesson plans.
Meets Expectations

Addresses the needs of struggling, on level, and above level learners through providing leveled readers or suggestions for struggling or above level students.
Needs Improvement

Addresses the needs of struggling, on level, and above level learners by providing suggestions for struggling or above level students.
Unacceptable

Does not address the needs of struggling, on level, and above level learners.
Affordability
5 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Inexpensive
Meets Expectations

Affordable
Needs Improvement

Expensive
Unacceptable

Not worth the investment.



Keywords:
  • curriculum design curriculum analysis

Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98