iRubric: Robert Rockett - SP19 Document 1: Analysis rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Robert Rockett - SP19 Document 1: Analysis

SP19 Document 1: Analysis

Rubric Code: GXC9CB8

By Kevin1952

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Humanities

Type: Writing

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Enter rubric title
	Professional 25 pts	Minor Revision Needed 19 pts	Acceptable, but Needs Work 14 pts	Major Revision Needed 9 pts	Unacceptable 4 pts
Argument	Professional Detailed argument with solid support from source documents. Points are made directly and examples support the primary assertions.	Minor Revision Needed Minor issues with use of examples and one or two major points.	Acceptable, but Needs Work Major issue with thesis or several issues with examples and main points.	Major Revision Needed Unclear thesis, some main points not stated clearly, and/or insufficient examples to support main ideas.	Unacceptable Lacks a proper argument and fails to support assertions effectively.
Coherence	Professional Every paragraph has a clear topic sentence that relates to the primary argument. Each paragraph clearly and effectively discusses one topic with smooth transitions to subsequent paragraphs.	Minor Revision Needed Minor issues with a few (1-3) paragraphs containing more than one topic or topic sentences that do not relate to the primary argument. A few issues (1-3) with transitioning between paragraphs.	Acceptable, but Needs Work A fairly coherent document with several issues with multiple topics and transitions.	Major Revision Needed The document is coherent up to a point, but major issues with topic sentences, multiple topics in each paragraph, or transitions. Overall, a confusing discussion.	Unacceptable The document lacks coherence due to major issues with paragraphing: topic sentences, topics for each paragraph, and transitions.
Audience	Professional Clear attention paid to intended audience. Proper use of active voice. Proper use of first person pronouns. Maintains an engaging appeal throughout.	Minor Revision Needed Audience is addressed effectively, but with few (1-3) minor errors in using first or second person, phrasing, word-choice, wordiness, or passive voice.	Acceptable, but Needs Work Some attention paid to audience, but several issues with using first or second person, phrasing, word-choice, wordiness, or passive voice	Major Revision Needed Numerous errors with first and second person, word-choice, phrasing, wordiness, and/or passive voice. Overall, message to the reader is confusing at best.	Unacceptable No attention paid to the audience and the work is riddled with errors in word-choice, phrasing, passive voice, wordiness, and using first or second person.
Mechanics, Grammar, & Spelling	Professional A professional job with editing. Completely free of mechanical, grammatical, or spelling errors.	Minor Revision Needed A few (1-3) minor issues with grammar, mechanics, and/or spelling.	Acceptable, but Needs Work Several issues with grammar, mechanics, and/or spelling.	Major Revision Needed Numerous issues with grammar, mechanics, and spelling. These issues hinder your credibility in this memo.	Unacceptable Mechanical, grammar, and spelling issues are so prevalent, that your memo is confusing.

Keywords:

Business Memo

Subjects:

Humanities

Types:

Writing

Discuss this rubric