Skip to main content
iRubric: Pitch for homecare referral rubric

iRubric: Pitch for homecare referral rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
This rubric will be used to assess the adult learners in the Homecare Breakthrough 'storytelling' and pitch workshop.
Rubric Code: GXBWAB8
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Vocational  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Pitch for home care referral
  Distinguished

4 pts

Proficient

3 pts

Basic

2 pts

Below Expectations

1 pts

Non-Performance

0 pts

The Presentation

Distinguished

The presentation was excellent and was presented in a manner to catch the attention of the audience with selective questioning or meeting a need.
Proficient

The presentation was very good and was presented in a manner that interested the audience but did not keep them engaged.
Basic

The presentation was fair, but was presented in a way that most audience members were not interested.
Below Expectations

The presentation was presented in a poor manner. Could not hook the audience into the story.
Non-Performance

No presentation submitted.
Introduction

Distinguished

The marketer introduced themselves to the audience before heading into the pitch and included the story of how they began in homecare
Proficient

The marketer stumbled through introduction at beginning of pitch and did not make themselves relatable with the story.
Basic

The marketer introduced themselves and moved straight into the pitch with no story.
Below Expectations

The marketer did not introduce themselves nor the story behind their motivations in homeware.
Non-Performance

No presentation submitted.
The Story

Distinguished

The story was presented in the clearly, it include a problem, a solution, and two characters. The story was relatable to caregivers.
Proficient

The story was presented in the clearly, however it did not include a problem, a solution, or two characters.
Basic

The story was presented in the unclearly and was not relatable.
Below Expectations

No story was presented.
Non-Performance

No presentation submitted.
Preparedness

Distinguished

The marketer was prepared and obviously had rehearsed the pitch.
They was able to present the pitch without referring to notes, and story flowed naturally.
Proficient

The marketer was pretty well prepared and had rehearsed the pitch
There were some minor problems.
The student referred to notes minimally.
Basic

The marketer was not well prepared and it was not clear if the pitch was rehearsed.
There were some significant flaws.
The marketer read from notes or referred to notes a lot.
Below Expectations

The marketer was so unprepared that the pitch could not be delivered.
Many major problems and flaws.
The marketer tried to wing it without preparation.
Non-Performance

No presentation submitted.
Confidence

Distinguished

The marketer was extremely confident while presenting the pitch. They showed a passion for what they were pitching, well paced, smiling, friendly, and relatable.
Proficient

The marketer was very confident while presenting the pitch. They were mostly passionate for what they were pitching, but seemed a little uneasy and relatable.
Basic

The marketer was not very confident while presenting the pitch. They were somewhat passionate about what they were pitching, but stumbled a few times and lack good pacing.
Below Expectations

The student was completely not confident while presenting the pitch.
Non-Performance

No presentation submitted.
Organization

Distinguished

The smarketer clearly organized the pitch in a manner that flowed logically and was successful.
Proficient

The marketer organized the pitch in a manner that flowed mostly logically and the pitch was mostly successful.
Basic

The marketer organized the pitch in a manner that flowed somewhat logically and the pitch with little success.
Below Expectations

The marketer organized the pitch in a manner that flowed completely illogically and the pitch was unsuccessful.
Non-Performance

No presentation submitted.
Convincing Arguments

Distinguished

The marketer made an excellent argument for their company to be used or on the list of recommended providers>
Green light all the way!
Proficient

The marketer made many excellent arguments for their company to be used or on the list of recommended providers
Green light after some tweaking!
Basic

The marketer made few arguments for their company to be used or on the list of recommended providers, most arguments were not clearly presented. <BR>
Highly unlikely this company would be referred or hired.
Below Expectations

The marketer made no arguments for the company to be used or on the list of recommended providers; <BR>
From this pitch, the business card would definitely be tossed.
Non-Performance

No presentation submitted.
Total

Distinguished
Proficient
Basic
Below Expectations
Non-Performance



Keywords:
  • Pitch Synopsis







Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98