Skip to main content
iRubric: Civic Activism Project rubric

iRubric: Civic Activism Project rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Civic Activism Project 
Civic Activism Project
Grading scale on critical thinking applied during our Activism project
Rubric Code: GXB25BB
By KristaPink
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Social Sciences  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Enter rubric title
  Weak

1 pts

Unacceptable

2 pts

Acceptable

3 pts

Strong

4 pts

Proposal

Weak

Offers biased interpretations of evidence, statements, graphics, questions,<BR>
information, or the points of view of others.<BR>
Fails to identify or hastily dismisses strong, relevant counter-arguments.<BR>
Ignores or superficially evaluates obvious alternative points of view.<BR>
Argues using fallacious or irrelevant reasons, and unwarranted claims.<BR>
Does not justify results or procedures, nor explain reasons.
Unacceptable

Misinterprets evidence, statements, graphics, questions, etc.<BR>
Fails to identify strong, relevant counter-arguments.<BR>
Ignores or superficially evaluates obvious alternative points of view.<BR>
Draws unwarranted or fallacious conclusions.<BR>
Justifies few results or procedures, seldom explains reasons.<BR>
Regardless of the evidence or reasons, maintains or defends views<BR>
based on self-interest or preconceptions.
Acceptable

Accurately interprets evidence, statements, graphics, questions, etc.<BR>
Identifies relevant arguments (reasons and claims) pro and con.<BR>
Offers analyses and evaluations of obvious alternative points of view.<BR>
Draws warranted, non-fallacious conclusions.<BR>
Justifies some results or procedures, explains reasons.<BR>
Fair-mindedly follows where evidence and reasons lead.
Strong

Accurately interprets evidence, statements, graphics, questions, etc.<BR>
Identifies the most important arguments (reasons and claims) pro and con.<BR>
Thoughtfully analyzes and evaluates major alternative points of view.<BR>
Draws warranted, judicious, non-fallacious conclusions.<BR>
Justifies key results and procedures, explains assumptions and reasons.<BR>
Fair-mindedly follows where evidence and reasons lead.
Real-World Implementation

Weak

Offers biased interpretations of evidence, statements, graphics, questions,<BR>
information, or the points of view of others.<BR>
Fails to identify or hastily dismisses strong, relevant counter-arguments.<BR>
Ignores or superficially evaluates obvious alternative points of view.<BR>
Argues using fallacious or irrelevant reasons, and unwarranted claims.<BR>
Does not justify results or procedures, nor explain reasons.
Unacceptable

Misinterprets evidence, statements, graphics, questions, etc.<BR>
Fails to identify strong, relevant counter-arguments.<BR>
Ignores or superficially evaluates obvious alternative points of view.<BR>
Draws unwarranted or fallacious conclusions.<BR>
Justifies few results or procedures, seldom explains reasons.<BR>
Regardless of the evidence or reasons, maintains or defends views<BR>
based on self-interest or preconceptions.
Acceptable

Accurately interprets evidence, statements, graphics, questions, etc.<BR>
Identifies relevant arguments (reasons and claims) pro and con.<BR>
Offers analyses and evaluations of obvious alternative points of view.<BR>
Draws warranted, non-fallacious conclusions.<BR>
Justifies some results or procedures, explains reasons.<BR>
Fair-mindedly follows where evidence and reasons lead.
Strong

Accurately interprets evidence, statements, graphics, questions, etc.<BR>
Identifies the most important arguments (reasons and claims) pro and con.<BR>
Thoughtfully analyzes and evaluates major alternative points of view.<BR>
Draws warranted, judicious, non-fallacious conclusions.<BR>
Justifies key results and procedures, explains assumptions and reasons.<BR>
Fair-mindedly follows where evidence and reasons lead.
Handout

Weak

Offers biased interpretations of evidence, statements, graphics, questions,<BR>
information, or the points of view of others.<BR>
Fails to identify or hastily dismisses strong, relevant counter-arguments.<BR>
Ignores or superficially evaluates obvious alternative points of view.<BR>
Argues using fallacious or irrelevant reasons, and unwarranted claims.<BR>
Does not justify results or procedures, nor explain reasons.
Unacceptable

Misinterprets evidence, statements, graphics, questions, etc.<BR>
Fails to identify strong, relevant counter-arguments.<BR>
Ignores or superficially evaluates obvious alternative points of view.<BR>
Draws unwarranted or fallacious conclusions.<BR>
Justifies few results or procedures, seldom explains reasons.<BR>
Regardless of the evidence or reasons, maintains or defends views<BR>
based on self-interest or preconceptions.
Acceptable

Accurately interprets evidence, statements, graphics, questions, etc.<BR>
Identifies relevant arguments (reasons and claims) pro and con.<BR>
Offers analyses and evaluations of obvious alternative points of view.<BR>
Draws warranted, non-fallacious conclusions.<BR>
Justifies some results or procedures, explains reasons.<BR>
Fair-mindedly follows where evidence and reasons lead.
Strong

Accurately interprets evidence, statements, graphics, questions, etc.<BR>
Identifies the most important arguments (reasons and claims) pro and con.<BR>
Thoughtfully analyzes and evaluates major alternative points of view.<BR>
Draws warranted, judicious, non-fallacious conclusions.<BR>
Justifies key results and procedures, explains assumptions and reasons.<BR>
Fair-mindedly follows where evidence and reasons lead.
Individual Effort

Weak

Offers biased interpretations of evidence, statements, graphics, questions,<BR>
information, or the points of view of others.<BR>
Fails to identify or hastily dismisses strong, relevant counter-arguments.<BR>
Ignores or superficially evaluates obvious alternative points of view.<BR>
Argues using fallacious or irrelevant reasons, and unwarranted claims.<BR>
Does not justify results or procedures, nor explain reasons.
Unacceptable

Misinterprets evidence, statements, graphics, questions, etc.<BR>
Fails to identify strong, relevant counter-arguments.<BR>
Ignores or superficially evaluates obvious alternative points of view.<BR>
Draws unwarranted or fallacious conclusions.<BR>
Justifies few results or procedures, seldom explains reasons.<BR>
Regardless of the evidence or reasons, maintains or defends views<BR>
based on self-interest or preconceptions.
Acceptable

Accurately interprets evidence, statements, graphics, questions, etc.<BR>
Identifies relevant arguments (reasons and claims) pro and con.<BR>
Offers analyses and evaluations of obvious alternative points of view.<BR>
Draws warranted, non-fallacious conclusions.<BR>
Justifies some results or procedures, explains reasons.<BR>
Fair-mindedly follows where evidence and reasons lead.
Strong

Accurately interprets evidence, statements, graphics, questions, etc.<BR>
Identifies the most important arguments (reasons and claims) pro and con.<BR>
Thoughtfully analyzes and evaluates major alternative points of view.<BR>
Draws warranted, judicious, non-fallacious conclusions.<BR>
Justifies key results and procedures, explains assumptions and reasons.<BR>
Fair-mindedly follows where evidence and reasons lead.





Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16