Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Blog Participation Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
(draft)
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Blog Participation Rubric
Discussion Board Participation Rubric
This rubric will be used to assign points for the blog participation. Each discussion board post is worth 10 points. Points will be based on your contribution to the discussion.
Rubric Code:
GXACXCX
By
glojensen
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject:
Education
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
Graduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Blog Participation
100 %
Excellent
4 pts
Good
3 pts
Progressing
2 pts
Poor
1 pts
Quality of Information
%
50
Excellent
Information clearly relates to the main topic. Contributions are substantive, thoughtful and relevant to the discussion. There is reference to course content or content found via research.
Good
Information mostly relates to the main topic. Contributions are thoughtful and relevant, but are sometimes not supported with course content or content found via research.
Progressing
Information sometimes relates to the main topic but tangents or non-relevant information is present. Missing citations.
Poor
Information has little or nothing to do with the main topic or simply restates the main concepts. Statements are not supported.
Participation
%
25
Excellent
Responds to members of the online community. Encourages and facilitates interaction among members of the online community. Utilizes reference material in the response.
Good
Responds to members of the online community. Uses citations in the response.
Progressing
Did not meet the minimum response to members of the online community. Response had no referenced materials.
Poor
Did not respond.
Adherence to Discussion Protocols
%
25
Excellent
No errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation or syntax. Professional versus conversational language. Digital Citizenship/netiquette protocols outlined in the orientation section of this course were followed.
Good
1-2 errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation or syntax. Some conversational language. Digital citizenship/netiquette protocols outlined in the orientation section of this course were followed
Progressing
Errors in grammar, spelling punctuation or syntax; conversational language and/or digital citizenship/netiquette protocols outlined in the orientation section of this course were not followed.
Poor
Sentences were fragments. Unprofessional language used.
Keywords:
discussion board, posting, replies, human anatomy
Subjects:
English
Science
Education
Types:
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to
ready to use
.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.