iRubric: Media Law Blog Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Media Law Blog Rubric

Online discussion assignments.

Rubric Code: GX35C5B

By Mike_Odom

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Law

Type: Assessment

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Media Law Blog Rubric
	4 0 pts	3 0 pts	2 0 pts	1 0 pts	0 0 pts
Issues & Facts Identifies legal issues and relevant facts in the hypothetical case.	4 Identifies 90% of the legal issues and relevant facts in the hypothetical case.	3 Identifies 80% of the legal issues and relevant facts in the hypothetical case.	2 Identifies 70% of the legal issues and relevant facts in the hypothetical case.	1 Identifies less than 60% of the legal issues and relevant facts in the hypothetical case.	0 Fails to identify any of the legal issues or relevant facts presented in the hypothetical case.
Pertinent Law Identification and explanation of pertinent laws that apply in the hypothetical case.	4 Identifies and explains 90% of the pertinent laws that apply in the hypothetical case.	3 Identifies and explains 80% of the pertinent laws that apply in the hypothetical case.	2 Identifies and explains 70% of the pertinent laws that apply in the hypothetical case.	1 Identifies and explains less than 60% of the pertinent laws that apply in the hypothetical case.	0 Fails to identify and explain any of the pertinent laws that apply in the hypothetical case.
Analysis For each legal issue, applies pertinent laws to the relevant facts presented in the case.	4 Very thorough and insightful analysis of the the legal issues using the relevant facts and pertinent laws.	3 Reasonably thorough analysis of the legal issues using the relevant facts and pertinent laws.	2 Somewhat thorough analysis of the legal issues using the relevant facts and pertinent laws.	1 Marginal analysis of the legal issues using the relevant facts and pertinent laws.	0 Unable to analyze the issues using relevant facts and pertinent laws.
Group discussion Quality of engagement in group discussion.	4 Excellent contribution to the discussion. Excellent use of Praise-Question-Polish method.	3 Good contribution to the discussion. Above average use of P-Q-P method.	2 Reasonable contribution to the discussion. Average use of P-Q-P method.	1 Limited evidence of contribution to the discussion. Below average use of P-Q-P method.	0 No evidence of any contribution to the discussion.
Frequency of blog posts Quantity of contributions to online discussion.	4 Consistently posts and responds to other group member's contributions.	3 Posts more than once to the discussion forum and responds more than once to other group member's contributions.	2 Posts at least once and includes a reply to other group member's contributions.	1 Posts once to the discussion forum and fails to reply to other group member's contributions.	0 Fails to post to the discussion forum.
Writing skills Spelling, punctuation and grammar.	4 No spelling, punctuation or grammar errors.	3 Less than 5 spelling, punctuation or grammar errors.	2 Less than 7 spelling, punctuation or grammar errors.	1 Less than 10 spelling, punctuation or grammar errors.	0 Multiple spelling, punctuation or grammar errors.

Keywords:

discussions online

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric