Skip to main content
iRubric: Scholarly Article Review rubric

iRubric: Scholarly Article Review rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Scholarly Article Review 
Rubric for grading article assignments for online MATH 570, History of Mathematics.
Rubric Code: GX2B245
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Math  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Article Abstract
  Poor or Missing

1 pts

Satisfactory

2 pts

Superior

3 pts

Format

Poor or Missing

More than 1 item INCORRECT from guidelines: margins, font size, spacing, etc.
Satisfactory

1 item INCORRECT from guidelines: margins, font size, spacing, etc.
Superior

All items CORRECT from guidelines: margins, font size, spacing, etc.
Length

Poor or Missing

Less than half a double-spaced page long.
Satisfactory

At least 1 full double-spaced page long.
Superior

More than 1 full double-spaced page long.
Information

Poor or Missing

More than 1 item MISSING from guidelines: author, journal, title, date, etc.
Satisfactory

Only 1 item MISSING from guidelines: author, journal, title, date, etc.
Superior

All items INCLUDED from guidelines: author, journal, title, date, etc.
Spelling & Grammar

Poor or Missing

Major spelling and/or grammar errors are present.
Satisfactory

Less than 2 minor spelling and/or grammar errors are present. Example of good quality graduate writing.
Superior

No spelling or grammar errors are present. Example of high quality graduate writing.
Quality of Summary

Poor or Missing

The summary section of the abstract does NOT clearly, accurately, and/or succinctly convey the basic ideas presented in the article in the student's own words. Three or more quotations are given and may not be cited properly.
Satisfactory

The summary section of the abstract clearly, accurately, and succinctly conveys the basic ideas presented in the article in the student's own words. Less than three quotations are given and are cited properly.
Superior

The summary section of the abstract clearly, accurately, and succinctly conveys the detailed ideas presented in the article in the student's own words and shows deep understanding and connection of the material discussed. Less than three quotations are given and are cited properly.
Quality of Reaction

Poor or Missing

The reaction section of the abstract includes mostly vague sentiments that do not demonstrate understanding of how the material presented can be incorporated into the student's own classroom. It does not include specific examples of personal experiences where the student "tried out" the ideas given in the article and does not give thoughtful reflection upon their level of success.
Satisfactory

The reaction section of the abstract includes specific, detailed information that demonstrates adequate understanding of how the material presented can be incorporated into the student's own classroom. It demonstrates thoughtful reflection upon the ideas presented.
Superior

The reaction section of the abstract includes specific, detailed information that demonstrates excellent understanding of how the material presented can be incorporated into the student's own classroom. It includes specific examples of personal experiences where the student "tried out" the ideas given in the article and thoughtful reflection upon their level of success.




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16