iRubric: BCT- Student Taught Lesson rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

BCT- Student Taught Lesson

Students will work in cooperative groups to create a lesson plan and implement the plan based on a chosen area of reading that needs remediation.

Rubric Code: G98B2B

By danielledangelo

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: English

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 6-8

Student Lead Lesson
	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts	Point Total (N/A)
Lesson Plan Agenda	Good Lesson plan template is neatly written or typed and is completely filled out. Includes all names, date, reading area, period.	Fair Lesson template is complete but only includes some parts of the lesson: name, date, reading area, and period are missing.	Poor Lesson plan template is not neat or complete, and does not includes most parts of the lesson. Name, date, reading area, and period are not given.	Point Total
Visuals	Good Visuals were used effectively to help demonstrate the concept taught. (either video, power point, notes, handouts, clear board writing, etc.)	Fair Visuals were used to help demonstrate the concept taught, but were not so effective.	Poor Visuals were not appropriate or effective to represent the concept taught.	Point Total
Lecture/Teaching	Good Lecture was based on the reading area and included all concepts of the standard. Your group effectively pre-taught the material before giving students practice and assessment.	Fair Lecture was based on the reading area and included some concepts of the standard, but did not effectively help to teach students before practice and assessment.	Poor Lecture was not based on the reading area and did not include any concepts of the standard. It did not aid student learning of the material before practice and assessment.	Point Total
Hands-On/ Minds-On	Good Demonstration/presentation and/or hands-on activity was included in the lesson and was related to your lesson based on your reading area.	Fair Demonstration and/or hands-on activity was included in the lesson However, teachers were not knowledgeable of the demonstration or activity and it was not useful to learning.	Poor Demonstration and/or hands-on activity was not included in the lesson or it was but was not at all related to the reading area standard.	Point Total
Engagement	Good Opening & Closing of lesson was breif but effective to get attention. There was a summary of the lesson at the end. Learners were very involved.	Fair Opening/Closing was too lengthy and did not really give a summary of the lesson. Learners were somewhat involved.	Poor No opening/closing was presented, and/or engagement was minimum.	Point Total
Pre/Post Assessment	Good Includes a pre/post test that is no more than 5 questions relating to standard taught. Students were given time to finish and quiz could prove learning results of the lesson.	Fair Includes over 5 questions or is too lengthy and takes up too much time. Students were not given time to finish quiz. Quiz did not represent learning.	Poor Did not include a pre/post test and/or it was unrelated to lesson and did not prove learning.	Point Total
Creativity	Good Creativity was highly represented in the lesson. Learners were excited and interested in the lesson. Plans were detailed and well planned.	Fair Creativity was represented in the lesson. Not all learners were excited and interested in the lesson. Planning could have been better.	Poor Creativity was not represented in the lesson. Learners were not excited and interested in the lesson. Poor planning was shown by a lack of effort of the student teachers.	Point Total

Keywords:

Student Taught Lesson Rubric

Subjects:

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric