Skip to main content
iRubric: Qualitative Interviews SLO 1 SOC 4 rubric

iRubric: Qualitative Interviews SLO 1 SOC 4 rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Qualitative Interviews SLO 1 SOC 4 
Qualitative Interviews SLO 1 SOC 4
Conduct qualitative interviews, summarize data, analysis of findings, ethical concerns in researching LAMC students.
Rubric Code: G2W44A5
By cjanderson47
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Social Sciences  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Interview
  Poor

1 pts

Acceptable

3 pts

Excellent

5 pts

Topic, goal, selection

Poor

Student failed to discuss their topic, goal, how selected respondents, sampling technique.
Acceptable

Student discussed most of their topic, goal, how selected respondents, their sampling technique.
Excellent

Student discussed all their topic, goal and how they selected respondents and their sampling technique.
Methodology/ problems

Poor

Student failed to discuss time, place, length of interview, how recorded information or they felt during interviews.
Acceptable

Student adequately discussed time, place, length of interview, how recorded information or they felt during interviews.
Excellent

Student discussed all the details time, place, length of interview, how recorded information or they felt during interviews.
Techniques/Rapport

Poor

Student failed to discuss techniques they used or rapport during their interviews.
Acceptable

Student adequately discussed techniques they used or rapport during their interviews.
Excellent

Student discussed the techniques they used in great depth during interviews
Findings

Poor

Student failed to discuss findings, theories, comments.
Acceptable

Student adequately discussed their findings, theories and comments.
Excellent

Student discussed their findings, theories and comments to great depth.
Ethical Concerns

Poor

Student did not address any ethical concerns before, during or after interviews.
Acceptable

Student did address some ethical concerns of student interviews.
Excellent

Student did addressed all ethical concerns of student interviews.
Conclusions

Poor

Student failed to discuss data in depth, its meaning or their conclusions.
Acceptable

Student adequately discussed data in depth, its meaning and their conclusions.
Excellent

Student discussed the data in depth, its meaning, what they would tell an audience and their conclusions.
Research Analysis/Opinion

Poor

Student failed to discuss improvements to their research or their overall opinion about this research assignment.
Acceptable

Student discussed some improvements to their research or some opinion on research assignment.
Excellent

Student properly discussed improvements and their overall opinion about this research assignment.
Field Notes

Poor

Missing/Too short
Acceptable

Minimum requirements met.
Excellent

Very thorough detailed field notes.
Writing Quality

Poor

Poor writing, grammar, spelling, organization of paper
Acceptable

Satisfactory writing but some grammar, spelling errors.
Excellent

Overall writing, grammar, spelling, organization of paper was excellent with very few spelling errors.





Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16