- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Frank's Rubric for Summary

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Frank's Rubric for Summary Summary Summary response evaluation Rubric Code: G235946 By khulam Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: History Type: Writing Grade Levels: 9-12

Persuasive Writing Rubric
	Poor 12 pts	Fair 14 pts	Good 16 pts	Proficient 20 pts
Thesis and supporting points	Poor No clear thesis or points of discussion are apparent. Student has not shown the reader what the paper is about with any clarity. Thesis may not even be written has a statement	Fair Attempt at a thesis in the introduction. However, points of discussion that support the thesis don't or barely exist. Some points may not be followed up on in the paper.	Good Thesis is clearly identifiable. Points of discussion are evident in the introduction and followed up in the body of the paper.	Proficient Thesis and points of discussion are clear, concise, and provable. The paper follows up on each point of discussion throughout the paper.
Organization	Poor The paper is very hard to follow. No sense of order or flow. Reader loses a sense of what the writer is trying to convey.	Fair The essay has a thesis and points of discussion in an introduction and follows through to write about each point, but strays off topic or bounces around somewhat.	Good There is a clear thesis, points of discussion, introduction and conclusion and the paper has an orderly flow.	Proficient There is a clear thesis, points of discussion, intro and conclusion and the writer connects each point with appropriate transitions. The paper is logical in its flow and direction.
Conventions	Poor Numerous errors distract the reader and make it difficult to read. Errors made mroe than one way for the same word/phrase.	Fair Limited control of conventions. Some errors in common patterns that partially hinder the reader's ability to follow the paper.	Good Control of most writing conventions. Errors are few and minor.	Proficient Exceptionally strong control of standard conventions of writing.
Improvements to Writing	Poor No/minimal demonstration of brainstroming, outlining, drafts, or attempts to improve upon their writing.	Fair Does not show many revisions to clear up languge, organization, fluency, conventions or writing style.	Good Evidence of a clear progression from beginning ideas to organized thoughts, pre-writing to drafts, rough drafts to improved final drafts.	Proficient Obvious continuous improvement culminating in an articulate and well'thought through argument for the thesis.