Skip to main content
iRubric: New Perspectives Interview PBL rubric

iRubric: New Perspectives Interview PBL rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
New Perspectives Interview PBL 
Rubric Code: G22W38A
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric New Perspectives Interview PBL
  Excellent

10 pts

Good

8.5 pts

Fair

7 pts

Poor

5.5 pts

Task

Excellent

Scholar has successfully completed ALL parts of the task and answered the PBL question: What voices are not being heard in the news, and how does a reporter seek out and encourage new perspectives on a current topic or issue of investigation?
- a relevant and personal focus area was selected
- a specific source with a unique perspective was chosen and interviewed
- a features story was developed to share the source interview information
Good

Scholar has completed MOST (2) parts of the task and answered the PBL question: What voices are not being heard in the news, and how does a reporter seek out and encourage new perspectives on a current topic or issue of investigation?
- a relevant and personal focus area was selected
- a specific source with a unique perspective was chosen and interviewed
- a features story was developed to share the source interview information
Fair

Scholar has completed only 1 part of the task and has not fully answered the PBL question: What voices are not being heard in the news, and how does a reporter seek out and encourage new perspectives on a current topic or issue of investigation?
- a relevant and personal focus area was selected
- a specific source with a unique perspective was chosen and interviewed
- a features story was developed to share the source interview information
Poor

Scholar has not completed any part of the task. Project is incomplete.
Background Information

Excellent

Scholar conducts thorough research that reveals a wealth of background information about the source and topic chosen for the interview; information reveals unique, interesting details and indicates thought about a focus for a story or Q-and-A.
Good

Scholar conducts some research that reveals basic information about the source and/or topic, but lacks depth or originality.
Fair

Essential information about the source is lacking. Scholar has not conducted much research for the interview or features story.
Poor

No background information or research was conducted.
Use of Questions

Excellent

Scholar develops and asks interview questions that are open-ended, balancing the need for general information with specific questions that reveal thoughtful responses and a specific story angle.
Good

Scholar develops and asks interview questions that focus too much on general information and lack specifics. Many follow-up questions are needed to gain more detail.
Fair

Scholar develops interview questions that are too general and are close-ended. Questions do not enable the student to gain enough quality information to produce a thorough finished product.
Poor

No questions created.
Direct Quotes & Information

Excellent

Scholar provides at least 3 relevant and informative, direct quotes from their source.

Scholar provides thorough and relevant paraphrased information from their interview. Scholar connects all quotes and pieces of information with transitional phrases that lead to an organized features story.
Good

Scholar provides 2 relevant and informative, direct quotes from their source.

Scholar provides relevant paraphrased information from their interview, but could use more detailed information at times. Scholar connects all quotes and pieces of information with transitional phrases that lead to an organized features story.
Fair

Scholar provides 1 relevant and informative, direct quote from their source.

Scholar struggles to provide relevant paraphrased information from their interview. More detail is needed. Scholar struggles to connect quotes and pieces of information with transitional phrases, and as a result, their features story is choppy and unorganized.
Poor

Scholar does not provide any direct quotes from their source.

Scholar does not provide paraphrased information or transitional phrases. Task is incomplete.
Features Story Organization & Mechanics

Excellent

The story is clear, coherent, interesting and informative. The basic format and conventions for the chosen journalism mode (printed article, vlog, podcast) are followed.
Good

Although it follows the overall task, the story could be more clearly focused. The finished project is informative, but lacks some important elements. The basic format and conventions for the chosen journalism mode (printed article, vlog, podcast) are followed with some minor errors.
Fair

The story and its information are flat and general. Focus isn’t clear. Mistakes in format and conventions for the chosen journalism mode (printed article, vlog, podcast) are obvious and may hinder understanding.
Poor

No story submitted.




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98