Skip to main content
iRubric: Specialization of Labor Writing Project (US I Snowden 21-22) rubric

iRubric: Specialization of Labor Writing Project (US I Snowden 21-22) rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Specialization of Labor Writing Project (US I Snowden 21-22) 
Rubric Code: G22C7W2
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: History  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Specialization of Labor Project
  Poor

25 pts

Fair

50 pts

Good

75 pts

Excellent

100 pts

Drafting

Poor

-Writing falls significantly short of length requirements.
-Writing includes virtually no clear details related to the assigned role.
-Writing has numerous errors that impede the reader's understanding and does not demonstrate and understanding of the role being recreated.
Fair

-Writing falls short of length requirements by at least 1 paragraph/5 sentences.
-Writing includes few details, and those used do not clearly relate to the assigned role.
-Writing is somewhat unclear and shows a limited understanding of the role being recreated.
Good

-Writing falls short of length requirements by a few sentences.
-Writing includes some details from both class materials and discussion, but does not fully depict the role assigned.
-Writing is clear and shows some understanding of the role recreated by the student.
Excellent

-Writing meets or exceeds length requirements.
-Writing includes numerous details from class materials and discussion.
-Writing is clear and demonstrates an understanding of the role the student is recreating.
-Writing shows clear creative effort in depicting the assigned role.
Peer Editing

Poor

-Recommendations made to your partner are respectful and constructive.
-You have given few recommendations related to how details could be used to improve historical accuracy, and recommendations do not demonstrate a clear understanding of the era.
Fair

-Recommendations made to your partner are respectful and constructive.
-You have given some recommendations related to how details could be used to improve historical accuracy, and recommendations demonstrate a limited understanding of the era.
Good

-Recommendations made to your partner are respectful and constructive.
-You have given numerous recommendations related to how details could be used to improve historical accuracy, and recommendations show some understanding of the era.
Excellent

-Recommendations made to your partner are respectful and constructive.
-You have given numerous recommendations related to how details could be used to improve historical accuracy, and recommendations show a strong understanding of the era.
-You have provided stylistic advice about how the role could be better depicted (i.e. you help your partner show the story)
Synthesis

Poor

-Writing falls significantly short of length requirements.
-Writing includes virtually no clear details and does not show an understanding of the topic.
Fair

-Writing falls short of length requirements by at least 1 paragraph/3 sentences.
-Writing includes few details, and those used show a limited understanding of the topic.
Good

-Writing falls short of length requirements by a few sentences.
-Writing includes some details from both class materials and discussion, demonstrating an understanding of the topic.
Excellent

-Writing meets or exceeds length requirements.
-Writing includes numerous details from class materials and discussion, demonstrating a strong understanding of the topic.




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16