Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Specialization of Labor Writing Project (US I Snowden 21-22) rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
(draft)
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Specialization of Labor Writing Project (US I Snowden 21-22)
Rubric Code:
G22C7W2
By
Dsnowden1111
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject:
History
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Specialization of Labor Project
Poor
25 pts
Fair
50 pts
Good
75 pts
Excellent
100 pts
Drafting
Poor
-Writing falls significantly short of length requirements.
-Writing includes virtually no clear details related to the assigned role.
-Writing has numerous errors that impede the reader's understanding and does not demonstrate and understanding of the role being recreated.
Fair
-Writing falls short of length requirements by at least 1 paragraph/5 sentences.
-Writing includes few details, and those used do not clearly relate to the assigned role.
-Writing is somewhat unclear and shows a limited understanding of the role being recreated.
Good
-Writing falls short of length requirements by a few sentences.
-Writing includes some details from both class materials and discussion, but does not fully depict the role assigned.
-Writing is clear and shows some understanding of the role recreated by the student.
Excellent
-Writing meets or exceeds length requirements.
-Writing includes numerous details from class materials and discussion.
-Writing is clear and demonstrates an understanding of the role the student is recreating.
-Writing shows clear creative effort in depicting the assigned role.
Peer Editing
Poor
-Recommendations made to your partner are respectful and constructive.
-You have given few recommendations related to how details could be used to improve historical accuracy, and recommendations do not demonstrate a clear understanding of the era.
Fair
-Recommendations made to your partner are respectful and constructive.
-You have given some recommendations related to how details could be used to improve historical accuracy, and recommendations demonstrate a limited understanding of the era.
Good
-Recommendations made to your partner are respectful and constructive.
-You have given numerous recommendations related to how details could be used to improve historical accuracy, and recommendations show some understanding of the era.
Excellent
-Recommendations made to your partner are respectful and constructive.
-You have given numerous recommendations related to how details could be used to improve historical accuracy, and recommendations show a strong understanding of the era.
-You have provided stylistic advice about how the role could be better depicted (i.e. you help your partner show the story)
Synthesis
Poor
-Writing falls significantly short of length requirements.
-Writing includes virtually no clear details and does not show an understanding of the topic.
Fair
-Writing falls short of length requirements by at least 1 paragraph/3 sentences.
-Writing includes few details, and those used show a limited understanding of the topic.
Good
-Writing falls short of length requirements by a few sentences.
-Writing includes some details from both class materials and discussion, demonstrating an understanding of the topic.
Excellent
-Writing meets or exceeds length requirements.
-Writing includes numerous details from class materials and discussion, demonstrating a strong understanding of the topic.
Subjects:
History
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More History rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to
ready to use
.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.