iRubric: Drama - Collective Creation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Drama - Collective Creation

This rubric is a way to effectively evaluate your overall contribution during the collective.

Rubric Code: G22A8WB

By stefanik

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Arts and Design

Type: Assessment

Grade Levels: 9-12

Project Assessment
	Excellent 5 pts	Good 4 pts	Fair 3 pts	Poor 2 pts	Negligent 1 pts
Participation & Effort	Excellent An incredible inspiration and driving force in attaining our outcome.	Good Very involved with the group and helped out as much as needed.	Fair Was an active member of the group but more was expected.	Poor Was disinterested and needed encouragement to "be there" for others.	Negligent Was more of a nuisance and distraction than a benefit.
Leadership & Reliability	Excellent Met all deadlines and was reliable in all things. Knew when and how to lead and follow. Could be trusted to rehearse creatively but consistently.	Good Worked diligently on all aspects of the project. Very effective. Led and followed without being a concern.	Fair Not completely dependable and could lead and follow but not without some disruptive energy.	Poor Made a marginal effort to meet the group standards.	Negligent Showed little interest in the project. Poor quality of work. Could not be counted on to do the little things: bring their props, costume, remember lines, etc. AN impolite opposite - all over the map, all the time.
Presentation	Excellent A person could not ask for more. They gave 100 to their character and the development of the character. They were prepared and always allowed me to act opposite them at my own maximum.	Good Did a great job in the presentation. Well prepared and rehearsed.<BR> I could count on them to act opposite me with minimum disappointment.	Fair Barely created a distinct and contributing character. Not dependable to be ready and give their all as expected, and as a result, diminished my exploration.	Poor Was involved in the presentation but gave a poor performance. Only marginally available to emit enough, thus my absorbing and emitting was often a one way street.	Negligent Was not involved or had little involvement in the presentation of the project. Poor character. They simply could and would not give enough without me being largely frustrated acting opposite them.
Staying on Task -Focus	Excellent All the time.	Good Most of the time.	Fair Some of the time. Distracted and distracting at times.	Poor As much time spent on our project as other things.	Negligent Rarely stayed on task. Only stayed on task with group members have to nag at them.