- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Ced0550 Discussion Thread Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Ced0550 Discussion Thread Rubric Ced0550 Discussion Thread Rubric Threaded discussion rubric built in part around Bloom's digital taxonomy. Rubric Code: FX65WX9 By JSteelecnm Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Education Type: Assignment Grade Levels: (none)

Discussion Board
	Exceeds Effort at this level is greater than expected and is graded as "B" or "A" 20 pts	Meets Expectations Effort at this level represents what is expected and is therefore graded in the "C" range 15 pts	Below Effort at this level is less than expected and is graded as "D" or "F" 10 pts
Grammar/Mechanics	Exceeds Posts/replies consistently show good grammar, have little or no spelling errors, and are presented in a structure/format that enhances readability	Meets Expectations Posts/replies have few spelling and grammatical errors. Text construction is mostly formal with few abbreviations or txt style language.	Below Poor spelling and grammatical errors in several posts/replies. Written in informal language, abbreviations or txt.
Promptness	Exceeds Thread is posted by given due date.	Meets Expectations Thread is posted within the discussion week.	Below Thread is posted later than discussion week.
Post construction	Exceeds Response shows insight, depth, and understanding and reflects the topic. Personal opinion is appropriately expressed and clearly relates to the thread.	Meets Expectations Response demonstrates some insight and depth. Personal opinion is appropriately expressed.	Below Response is brief and lacks insight and depth.
Reply construction	Exceeds Replies show insight, depth and understanding. They connect with the original thread and add to that thread. Personal opinon is constructive and sensitive.	Meets Expectations Replies demonstrate some insight, depth, or connection to the original thread. Personal opinion is appropriately expressed and replies as a whole add to the discussion.	Below Replies are brief and lack insight and depth. Personal opinions are stated without support or detract from the discussion.