iRubric: Creating Original Content rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Creating Original Content

Students will choose and construct original content for Romeo and Juliet based on character traits from the choices provided.

Rubric Code: FX54934

By brandodm

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: English

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 9-12

Romeo & Juliet Group Project
	Excellent 5 pts	Good 4 pts	Satisfactory 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts
Comprehension	Excellent Project displays an extensive understanding of the characters, plot, and theme in the play. Group utilized elements from the play to skillfully go beyond the play itself, adding their own interpretation of events, characters, theme, etc.	Good Project displays a clear understanding of the characters, plot, and theme in the play. Group utilized elements from the play to sufficiently go beyond the play itself, adding their own interpretation of events, characters, theme, etc.	Satisfactory Project displays a sound understanding of the characters, plot, and theme in the play, but this understanding may be lacking in depth and/or complexity. Group utilized some elements from the play to go somewhat beyond the novel itself.	Fair Project displays a basic understanding of the characters, plot, and theme in the play. Group did not utilize sufficient elements from the play to go beyond the play itself, and/or did not add their own interpretation of events, characters, theme, etc.	Poor Project does not display an understanding of the characters, plot, and theme in the play. Group did not extend ideas beyond the play.
Relevance of Content	Excellent Project displays content and details that are truly relevant, interesting, meaningful, engaging and specific. This group thoughtfully engaged with the details of his or her content.	Good Project displays content and details that are mostly relevant, interesting, meaniningful, engaging and specific. This group engaged with the details of his or her content.	Satisfactory Project displays content and details that are somewhat relevant, interesting, meaniningful, engaging and specific. This group should have more thoughtfully engaged with the details of his or her content.	Fair Project displays content and details that are limited and not very relevant, interesting, meaniningful, engaging and specific. This group did not thoughtfully engage with the details of his or her content.	Poor Project does not display content and details that are relevant, interesting, meaniningful, engaging and specific. This group did not thoughtfully engage with the details of his or her content.
Creativity	Excellent Project has extremely creative and original ideas. Truly showed the group's creative talents. The project had a strong 'voice' and was distinctive.	Good Project has several creative and original ideas. Most aspects showed some level of creativity and a satisfactory and unique voice.	Satisfactory Project has some creative and original ideas. Some aspects demonstrated some level of creativity and a satisfactory and unique voice.	Fair Project has minimal creativity and original ideas. The group's unique voice was lacking.	Poor Project has little to no creative and original ideas.
Organization	Excellent Provides a clear and precise interpretation of the elements of the play. Is engaging and easy to follow. All aspects of the criteria are followed and incorporated into the project to enhance the overall effect.	Good Provides a clear interpretation of the elements of the play. Is easy to follow. All aspects of the criteria are followed and incorporated.	Satisfactory Provides a rendering of the elements of the play that is mostly clear. Is fairly easy to follow. All aspects of the criteria are met	Fair Rendering of the elements of the play is unclear. Not all aspects of the criteria are met.	Poor Inadequate material on which to assess or is unclear and confusing. Major portions of the criteria are not met.
Style	Excellent Demonstrates a superior ability to communicate with clarity and flair. Is fluent, varied, precise and vivid in expression. Follows conventions of standard English.	Good Demonstrates a sound ability to communicate clearly. Attempts to be fluent, and vivid in expression. Follows conventions of standard English.	Satisfactory Demonstrates an inconsistent ability to communicate clearly. Includes multiple errors in the use of standard English.	Fair Demonstrates a weak ability to communicate clearly. Includes multiple major errors in use of standard English.	Poor Major errors in standard English prevent the ability to communicate ideas.
Overall Effectivenes	Excellent Project is well planned out and executed. Original content created enhances and adds meaning beyond the play.	Good Project is well planned out. Original Content adds meaning beyond the play.	Satisfactory Project could be better planned out and executed to increase effectiveness. Original content reflects meaning of the play.	Fair Project is not effective in its execution. Connections between the original content created and the play are not clear.	Poor Project is ineffective. No connection between original content created and the play.

Keywords:

English, Novel, Project, Presentation

Subjects:

English

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric