Skip to main content

iRubric: Reading Standards for Literacy in Science rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Reading Standards for Literacy in Science 
Rubric for Evaluating Standards for Literacy in Science and Technical Subjects.
Rubric Code: FX3336A
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Science  
Type: Reading  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Literacy Standards
  Poor

2 pts

Fair

3 pts

Good

4 pts

Cite specific textual evidence

Poor

Does not cite specific textual evidence to support analysis of science and technical texts. Does not point out important distinctions the author makes. Does not point out gaps or inconsistencies in the account
Fair

Cites some specific textual evidence to support analysis of science and technical texts. Attends to some important distinctions the author makes. Points out some gaps and inconsistencies in the account.
Good

Cites specific textual evidence to support analysis of science and technical texts, attending to important distinctions the author makes and to any gaps or inconsistencies in the account.
Determine central ideas

Poor

Does not determine the central ideas or conclusions of a text. Does not summarize complex concepts, processes or information. Does not paraphrase texts in simpler but still accurate terms.
Fair

Determines some central ideas or conclusions. Summarizes some complex concepts, processes or information. Some paraphrasing is done in simpler but still accurate terms.
Good

Determine the central ideas or conclusions of a text; summarize complex concepts, processes, or information presented in a text by paraphrasing them in simpler but still accurate terms
Determine key meanings

Poor

Does not determine the meaning of symbols, key terms, and other domain-specific words and phrases as they are used in a specific scientific or technical context relevant to grades 11–12 texts and topics.
Fair

Some determination of the meaning of symbols, key terms, and other domain-specific words and phrases as they are used in a specific scientific or technical context relevant to grades 11–12 texts and topics is evident.
Good

Determine the meaning of symbols, key terms, and other domain-specific words and phrases as they are used in a specific scientific or technical context.
Analyze structure

Poor

Does not analyze how the text structures information or ideas into categories or hierarchies, demonstrating understanding of the information or ideas.
Fair

Some analysis of how the text structures information or ideas into categories or hierarchies, demonstrating understanding of the information or ideas is present.
Good

Analyze how the text structures information or ideas into categories or hierarchies, demonstrating understanding of the information or ideas.
Analyze author's purpose

Poor

Does not analyze the author’s purpose in providing an explanation, describing a procedure, or discussing an experiment in a text. Unresolved issues are not identified.
Fair

There is some analysis of the author’s purpose in providing an explanation, describing a procedure, or discussing an experiment in a text. Some important issues that remain unresolved are identified.
Good

Analyze the author’s purpose in providing an explanation, describing a procedure, or discussing an experiment in a text, identifying important issues that remain unresolved.




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n243