Skip to main content

iRubric: Written case analysis assessment rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Written case analysis assessment 
Written case analysis assessment
Rubric Code: FB7AA8
By lopezjohnc
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Business  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Case analysis
  Excellent

100 pts

Good

85 pts

Fair

75 pts

Poor

65 pts

Case Summary
1 pts

Excellent

Succinctly summarizes case with strengths and weaknesses of the client's situation
Good

Mostly repeats the fact patterns of the case and gives a few strengths and weaknesses of the client's situation
Fair

Much repetition of the fact pattern of the case with little thought to strengths and weaknesses of the client's situation
Poor

Repeats the fact patterns of the case with no thought to strengths or weaknesses of the client's situation
Issues analysis
40 pts

Excellent

The analysis of the issues is thoughtful and complete. Recognizes and analyzes client's shortcomings in each area of the Personal Financial Topics
Good

The analysis of issues is mostly accurate, but lacking in depth. Recognizes and analyzes most of the client's shortcomings in each area of the Personal Financial topics
Fair

The analysis of issues is somewhat accurate, but lacking in depth. Recognizes and analyzes some of the client's shortcomings in each area of the Personal Financial topics
Poor

The analysis of issues is shallow or contains major flaws. Several of the Personal Financial topics are not analyzed.
Recommendations
40 %
Rigor
10 pts

Excellent

Recommendations are thoroughly linked to or based on the analysis of the case and are analytically correct.
All financial analysis is presented and consequences are anticipated.
Good

Recommendations are in part linked to or based on the analysis of the case. Some financial analysis is presented. Consequences of the recommendations are somewhat anticipated.
Fair

Recommendations are somewhat linked to the analysis of the case. Some financial analysis is presented, however consequences are not well anticipated.
Poor

Recommendations are somewhat linked to the analysis of the case. Some financial analysis is presented, however consequences are not well anticipated.
Appropriateness
40 pts

Excellent

The recommended course of action is appropriate to address the major issues of the case. Financial analysis is complete and accurate.
Good

The recommended course of action is appropriate to address some but not all major issues of the case are addressed. Financial analysis is somewhat complete and accurate.
Fair

The recommended course of action is somewhat appropriate to addres the major issues of the case. Financial analysis is weak and not accurate.
Poor

The recommended course of action does not address a several of the major issues of the case. Financial analysis is missing or incorrectly applied.
Written presentation
20 %
Clarity and persuasiveness
30 pts

Excellent

Clear and persuasive articulation and explanation of ideas.
Good

Somewhat clear and persuasive articulation and explanation of ideas.
Fair

Somewhat unclear and unpersuasive.
Poor

Unclear, confused, and unpersuasive articulation and explanation of ideas.
Grammar, syntax and typos
30 pts

Excellent

Proper English grammar, syntax, and/or usage. No spelling or typographical errors
Good

Occasional use of improper English grammar, syntax, and/or usage. Up to three spelling or typographical errors
Fair

Moderate use of improper English grammar, syntax, and/or usage. More than three spelling or typographical errors
Poor

Frequent or consistent use of improper English grammar, syntax, and/or usage. More than five spelling or typographical errors
Formatting
10 pts

Excellent

Uses bullet points, heading, and other formatting to structure the content and enhance its clarity.
Good

Modest use of bullet points, headings, and other formatting to structure the content, but not in a way that enhances its clarity.
Fair

Attempts to use bullet points, headings, and other formatting to structure the content to enhance clarity.
Poor

No use of bullet points, headings, and other formatting to enhance clarity of the text.
Length
10 pts

Excellent

The length of the write-up exceeds the guidelines.
Good

Length of the write-up meets the guidelines.
Fair

Length of write up is 75% of the guidelines
Poor

Length of write up is 50% of the guidelines.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n58