iRubric: I-Search ReflectProject rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

I-Search ReflectProject

I-Search Paper

Rubric Code: F967WC

By nulljen

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: English

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 6-8, 9-12, Undergraduate

Composition I-Search Rubric
	Poor 5 pts	Fair 10 pts	Good 15 pts	Excellent 20 pts
Introduction	Poor Incomplete introduction. Does not properly identify topic. Does not clearly outline prior knowledge or explanation of why topic was chosen.	Fair Weak introduction. Unclear topic; unclear what led the writer to chose topic.	Good Good introduction. Fairly evident prior knowledge and what the writer wanted to learn through research.	Excellent Excellent introduction. Establishes prior knowledge and evidence of why the writer wanted to pursue topic.
Process/Experience	Poor Little or no independent research strategy evident.	Fair Very general description of search provided, little or no specific details.	Good General description of search provided. Lacks adequate explanation of process including faiures and successes.	Excellent Specific details of search provided with examples of failures and successes.
Reflection/Impact	Poor Little or no evidence of awareness of further questions or research. Little or no self-evaluation of topic.	Fair Shows little awareness of new questions and research. Very little self-evaluation provided.	Good Notes further questions and research. Some self-evaluation provided.	Excellent Intelligent and interesting discussion of further questions and research. Much self-evaluation provided.
References/Works Cited	Poor Little or no attempt to follow MLA style. Missing more than one source.	Fair Has made a fair attempt to cite sources and use correct form. Missing one source.	Good Generally follows MLA style format. All sources present.	Excellent Includes the minimum of three or more varied sources, as required. Follows MLA style.
Mechanics	Poor Numerous errors affecting the text significantly	Fair Several errors some affecting the text significantly	Good Few errors which do not affect the text significantly	Excellent There are no or few errors which do not affect the text.
Oral Presentation
	Poor 5 pts	Fair 10 pts	Good 15 pts	Excellent 20 pts
Visual Aid	Poor No visual aid or obvious lack of effort to meet requirements.	Fair Effort made to meet requirements, but missing minimum amount of graphics (5) or major findings (3). Not professional or neat-looking.	Good Good effort made to meet requirements. Meets the minimum requirement of major findings (3), but may be missing a graphic or not of quality desgin.	Excellent All requirements made and an excellent attempt at professional desgin and execution.
Learning	Poor No clear evidence that researcher has been able to answer research question.	Fair Conclusions stated, but not described. No specific details about topic provided. Not enough support or development provided. Does not meet minimum of three major findings.	Good Good conclusions supported by resources. Minimum of three major findings evident but not explained adequately.	Excellent Conclusion stongly supported with resources and excellent explanation of at least three major findings.
Content/Organization	Poor Does not grasp information and cannot answer audience questions. Subject and purpose not clearly defined and lacks sufficient support of findings.	Fair Appears comforatble with information but is only able to answer basic questions. Attempts to define subject and purpose but provides weak explanation of findings.	Good Is at ease with information and able to answer questions. Has clear subject and purpose but still lacking sufficient explanation of findings.	Excellent Full knowledge of information by answering quetions and appearing confident with subject. Provides clear purpose and subject with well explained support of findings.
Delivery	Poor No eye contact, as if entire report is read from notes. Low volume or monotonous tone.	Fair Minimal eye contact, while reading mostly from notes. Speaks in uneven volume with llittle or no inflection.	Good Consistent eye contact, but too frequently returns to notes. Satisfactory variation of volume and inflection.	Excellent Holds attention of audience with eye contact throughout, seldom looking at notes. Appropriate volume and inflection to maintain audience interest.
Audience Awareness/Enthusiasm	Poor Fails to increase audience understanding of knowledge of topic. Shows no interest in topic presented.	Fair Raises audience understanding and knowledge of some points. Shows little or mixed feelings about topic.	Good Raises understanding and awareness of most points. Shows some enthusiasm about the topic.	Excellent Significantly increases audience understanding and knowledge of topic. Convinces audience to recognize the importance and validity of the subject. Demonstrates strong enthusiasm about the topic during the entire presentation.

Keywords:

I-Search, Rubric

Subjects:

English

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric