Skip to main content
iRubric: Scientific Notation-PowerPoint rubric

iRubric: Scientific Notation-PowerPoint rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Scientific Notation-PowerPoint 
Scientific Notation-3 Facts & 1 Fib
Students create a ppt that takes participants through the world of scientific notation. Aligns to Ok Process Standards, Grades 6-8 Process Standard 1: Problem Solving; 6. Use oral, written, concrete, pictorial, graphical, and/or algebraic methods to model mathematical situations. Process Standard 2: Communication; 1. Discuss, interpret, translate (from one to another) and evaluate mathematical ideas (e.g., oral, written, pictorial, concrete, graphical, algebraic); and 3. Select and use appropriate terminology when discussing mathematical concepts and ideas. Process Standard 4: Connections 1. Apply mathematical strategies to solve problems that arise from other disciplines and the real world. Grade 8 PASS: Standard 2: Number Sense and Operation – The student will use numbers and number relationships to solve a variety of problems; 1. Number Sense: Represent and interpret large numbers and numbers less than one in exponential and scientific notation.
Rubric Code: F6A424
By MissWright
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Math  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric PowerPoint
Scientific Notation--PowerPoint
  Excellent

Artifact met all of the criteria and provided additional information.

9 pts

Good

Artifact met all of the criteria

7 pts

Satisfactory

Artifact met most of the criteria.

5 pts

Poor

Artifact met little of the criteria.

3 pts

Unsatisfactory

Artifact did not meet criteria.

1 pts

Content Accuracy
2 pts

Statements contain pertinent information applicable to the use of scientific notation in a real-world setting.
Excellent

There are 10 or more facts that detail the accurate use of scientific notation in a real-world setting. This does NOT include conversion examples.
Good

There are 8-9 facts that detail the accurate use of scientific notation in a real-world setting. This does NOT include conversion examples.
Satisfactory

There are 6-7 facts that detail the accurate use of scientific notation in a real-world setting. This does NOT include conversion examples.
Poor

There are 4-5 facts that detail the accurate use of scientific notation in a real-world setting. This does NOT include conversion examples.
Unsatisfactory

There are 3 or fewer facts that detail the accurate use of scientific notation in a real-world setting.
Instructional Effectiveness
2 pts

Viewers can see the relationship between very large numbers and scientific notation with positive exponents and between very small numbers with negative exponents.
Excellent

There are at least 8 accurate conversion examples using both positive and negative exponents. In addition, there is a 'student' quiz' at the end with answers provided on a separate slide.
Good

There are 6-7 accurate conversion examples using both positive and negative exponents. In addition, there is a 'student' quiz' at the end with answers provided on a separate slide.
Satisfactory

There are 4-5 accurate conversion examples using both positive and negative exponents. In addition, there is a 'student' quiz' at the end with answers provided on a separate slide.
Poor

There are 2-3 accurate conversion examples using both positive and negative exponents. In addition, there is a 'student' quiz' at the end with answers provided on a separate slide.
Unsatisfactory

There are 1 or fewer accurate conversion examples and/or the examples used contain errors. In addition, there is a 'student' quiz' at the end with answers provided on a separate slide.
Presentation
2 pts

The artifact is neat and easy to read. Viewers want to examine the artifact based on how it appears.
Excellent

Information is neatly typed in Microsoft PowerPoint and set up to be viewed as a slide show with 2-4 supporting statements (fact/use/example) per slide. Images that add meaning or context to the statements are included in each slide. Slides are well-organized: neither cluttered nor sparse.
Good

Information is neatly typed in Microsoft PowerPoint and set up to be viewed as a slide show with 2-4 supporting statements (fact/use/example) per slide. Images that add meaning or context to the statements are included in each slide. Slides are well-organized, but appear somewhat cluttered or sparse.
Satisfactory

Information is neatly typed in Microsoft PowerPoint and set up to be viewed as a slide show with fewer than 3 supporting (fact/use/example) per slide. Images that add meaning or context to the statements are included in each slide. Slides are well-organized, but sparse.
Poor

Information is neatly typed in Microsoft PowerPoint and set up to be viewed as a slide show with 4-5 supporting (fact/use/example) per slide. Images that add meaning or context to the statements are included in each slide. Slides are well-organized, but cluttered.
Unsatisfactory

Information is neatly typed in Microsoft PowerPoint and set up to be viewed as a slide show. There are far too many/few supporting (fact/use/example) per slide. Slides are very cluttered/sparse.
References
2 pts

A reference (website, magazine, etc) is provided for each image and fact.
Excellent

All image and information references are typed in MLA format and provided on the last slide. There are no errors.
Good

All image and information references are typed in MLA format and provided on the last slide. There are 1-2 minor errors in that information is missing, or the format is wrong.
Satisfactory

All image and information references are typed in MLA format and provided on the last slide. There are 3-4 minor errors in that information is missing, or the format is wrong.
Poor

Image and information references are in MLA format and provided on the last slide. There are 6-10 minor errors in that information is missing, or the format is wrong.
Unsatisfactory

Image and information references are in MLA format and provided on the last slide. There are major errors in either missing information or the format is wrong.



Keywords:
  • collage scientific notation

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98