iRubric: Article I of the Constitution rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Article I of the Constitution

Students will work in groups and research one of the sections in Article I. You will create a presentation. These findings will be presented on a poster, Canva, infographic, etc. (NO GOOGLE SLIDES) with a title, definition, pictures, link to video (QR codes), and/or articles to make the connection.

Rubric Code: F24859A

By Ebenitez

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: History

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 9-12

Articles I of the Constitution
	Unacceptable 0 pts	Poor 20 pts	Fair 40 pts	Good 60 pts	Advanced 80 pts	Superior 100 pts
Knowledge of Section	Unacceptable The groups did not research a section or shows no knowledge of the section	Poor Group research a section but did not define and shows little knowledge of the section	Fair Group's section shows marginal knowledge, is able to define clearly.	Good The section given to the group is well defined and explained.	Advanced The section presented by the group is clearly defined in a way that if presented to a person with no knowledge that they could obtain understanding.	Superior The group defines the article clearly and in detail, presenting the topic as if it is being explained to a person with no knowledge of the topic so that they could obtain understanding. It is clear cut, yet thorough.
Example of Section	Unacceptable The group did not research a section.	Poor The example of the section is irrelevant.	Fair The example may be important but it shows slight relevancy, making it hard to connect.	Good The example is contemporary and shows mild relevancy, making it possible to make connections to the local area.	Advanced The example is contemporary and shows relevancy making it easy to show strong connections.	Superior The example is contemporary and shows extreme relevancy making it easy to show strong connections.
Connection of Section	Unacceptable There is no local connection made to the section given.	Poor The writing used to connect with the example makes little to no connection and is poorly constructed.	Fair Either the writing used to connect with the nexample makes little to no connection OR it is poorly constructed.	Good The writing makes a connection. The writing is of decent quality or the article may be too short.	Advanced Either the writing or the article makes a direct and significant connection from the principle, if written, it is neatly constructed.	Superior Either the writing or the article makes a direct and significant connection from the principle chosen if written, it is neatly constructed.
Grammar/Punctuation/Neatness.	Unacceptable There is no attempt made to check grammar/spelling and the project looks messy.	Poor There are over 5 mistakes made between grammar and spelling, the project looks messy.	Fair There are more than a couple(over two) of mistakes made on the page. The project also may look a little messy.	Good There are a couple (no more than two) grammatical or punctuation mistakes. The words on the page are a little messy.	Advanced There are a couple (no more than two) grammatical or punctuation mistakes. The words on the page look neat and tidy.	Superior Grammar and punctuation are both flawlwss. The words on the page look neat and tidy.
Overall Aesthetics	Unacceptable It looks as if the group put no effort into how the project looks. It is disorganized and unkempt.	Poor It looks as if the group put little effort into how the project looks. Project looks either unorganized or unkempt.	Fair Articles/writings are on the board in a manner that allows observers to figure out what is going on.	Good The project is organized well on the board. There is a flow that allows observers to figure out what connections are trying to be made. Articles and writings are constructed and placed in an order that is easy to read.	Advanced The project is organized well on the board. There is a flow that allows observers to figure out what connections are trying to be made.Articles and writings are constructed and placed in an order that is easy to read. Color is used.	Superior The project is organized well on the board. There is a flow that allows observers to figure out what connections are trying to be made.Articles and writings are constructed and placed in an order that is easy to read. Color is used. The project is not only easy to look at but pleasing to the eye. It is easy to tell much time and care is put into the project.

Subjects:

History

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric