Skip to main content

iRubric: Annotated Bibliography rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Annotated Bibliography 
Annotated Bibliography
Rubric Code: E4C654
By CCosta0179NB
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Annotated Bibliography
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Organization

Poor

2 or 3 problems with organization of information separate ideas are not discussed in separate paragraphs reader must reread at times for clarity or leaves reader confused
Fair

Information is generally organized with only 1 or 2 problems separate ideas discussed in separate paragraphs content is generally clear to reader
Good

Information is organized with well constructed paragraphs content flows nicely to add clarity to reader
Excellent

Information is very organized with well constructed paragraphs content follows a logical sequence which adds clarity to reader
Quality of Information

Poor

Information has little to do with the questions posed in the introduction no supporting details and/or examples provided.
Few, if any, of your sources are relevant to your topic or
you have not read closely enough to determine if your sources are related or not.
Fair

Information is not entirely related to questions posed in thesis; no supporting details and/or examples provided.
Some of your sources cover your topic, but they are uninspiring and their relevance to this project is unclear.
Good

Information clearly relates to questions posed in thesis; 1 or 2 supporting details and/or examples are used to add interest.
Your sources are interesting and most are appropriate. A few may be less clearly relevant to your topic.
Excellent

Information clearly relates to questions posed in thesis; unique, creative supporting details and/or examples are used which add interest to reader; Your sources are interesting and appropriate. Each is clearly relevant to your topic.
Summary

Poor

Important points not identified; does not relate to questions posed in thesis; You try to summarize your sources, but have trouble focusing on the main idea. You make no attempt to connect your sources to your thesis or to one-another or no attempt to clearly summarize your sources. There is no connection between your sources and your thesis. You make no comparisons between sources.
Fair

Not all of the important points are identified; there are some gaps in logic relating conclusions to the questions posed in thesis; You try to summarize your sources, but are unclear about their main idea. You have difficulty identifying a distinct connection to your thesis or between sources.
Good

Important points indicated conclusions are reasonable and relate to the questions posed in thesis; You clearly summarize the main idea of each of your sources. Their connection to your thesis and to one-another is less apparent.
Excellent

Highlights important information conclusions are logical and reasonable and clearly relate to the questions posed in thesis; You clearly summarize the main idea of each of your sources. You explicitly connect sources to your thesis and to one-another.
Mechanics/Conventions

Poor

There are a number of major errors in punctuation, grammar and/or spelling which make it difficult to read
source used is not documented consistently; 5 or less sources used
Fair

There are 1 or 2 major errors in punctuation, grammar and/or spelling which do interrupt the flow for the reader
Attempt to document source used is not completely accurate;
6-7 sources used
Good

There are 3 or 4 minor errors in punctuation, grammar and/or spelling which do not break the flow for the reader
All sources are accurately documented and in the desired format;
8-10 sources were used
Excellent

All sources are accurately documented and in the desired format
10 or more sources were used
There are no grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors
Sources

Poor

You don’t really know much about most of the author(s) of your resources or make no attempt at identifying your authors or their credentials.
Fair

You identify the author(s) of a few of your sources and their credentials seem less relevant or questionable.
Good

You identify the author(s) for more than half of your sources and their credentials are good.
Excellent

You identify the author(s) of your sources and their credentials are excellent.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n243