Skip to main content
iRubric: GMO Debate - Should people AVOID eating GMO's. rubric

iRubric: GMO Debate - Should people AVOID eating GMO's. rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
GMO Debate - Should people AVOID eating GMO's. 
The Great Debate - Tuck Everlasting
People should AVOID EATING GMO's ?
Rubric Code: DXB49C3
By teamaged
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Vocational  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Debate
Teams present opposing views on a specific topic.
  Level 4

Excellent

3 pts

Level 3

Good

2 pts

Level 2

Fair

1 pts

Level 1

Poor

0 pts

Understanding of Topic

Level 4

The team STRONGLY UNDERSTANDS the topic, and CONVINCINGLY presented the information.
Level 3

The team UNDERSTANDS the topic, and presented the information.
Level 2

The team has a week UNDERSTANDING of the topic, and ATTEMPTED to present the information.
Level 1

The team did NOT UNDERSTAND the topic, and/or did NOT TRY to present the information.
Opening Statement

Level 4

The opening statement STRONGLY DEFINED the team's viewpoint, and briefly lists their 2 MAJOR POINTS in a CLEVER and INTERESTING way.
Level 3

The opening statement DEFINED the team's viewpoint, and briefly lists their 2 MAJOR POINTS in a SOMEWHAT INTERESTING way.
Level 2

The opening statement VAGUELY DEFINED the team's viewpoint, and listed 1 MAJOR POINT.
Level 1

The opening statement did NOT DEFINE the team's viewpoint, and did NOT list a MAJOR point.
Major Point #1

First Viewpoint
Level 4

Point #1 CLEARLY expressed their viewpoint, and included AT LEAST 3 examples to support their point.
Level 3

Point #1 CLEARLY expressed their viewpoint, and included AT LEAST 3 examples to support their point.
Level 2

Point #1 ATTEMPTED to express their viewpoint, and included 2 examples to support their point.
Level 1

Point #1 was NOT expressed as their viewpoint, and included 1 or NO example to support their point.
Major Point 2

Second Viewpoint
Level 4

Point #2 CLEARLY expressed their viewpoint, and included AT LEAST 3 EXAMPLES to support their point.
Level 3

Point #2 CLEARLY expressed their viewpoint, and included AT LEAST 3 EXAMPLES to support their point.
Level 2

Point #2 ATTEMPTED to express their viewpoint, and included 2 EXAMPLES to support their point.
Level 1

Point #2 is NOT expressed as their viewpoint, and included 1 or NO EXAMPLE to support their point.
Fact vs. Opinion

Facts are 'documented' which means the SOURCE was stated. Opinions have no documented (stated) source.
Level 4

ALL statements were documented as based in SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH rather than opinion.

MULTIPLE sources were stated (documented).
Level 3

A MAJORITY of statements were documented as based in SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH rather than opinion.

MULTIPLE sources were stated (documented).
Level 2

A MINORITY of statements were documented as based in SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH rather than opinion.

ONLY ONE source were stated (documented).
Level 1

NO statements were demonstrated as based in SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH rather than opinion.

NO source was stated (documented).
Rebuttal

Counter Arguement
Level 4

ALL counter-arguments were RELEVANT and STRONG.

Rebuttal STRONGLY DEFENDED their position.
Level 3

The MAJORITY of counter-arguments were RELEVANT and STRONG.

Rebuttal SOMEWHAT DEFENDED their position.
Level 2

SOME counter-arguments were RELEVANT and STRONG.

Rebuttal SOMEWHAT DEFENDED their position.
Level 1

Counter-arguments were NOT RELEVANT nor STRONG.

Rebuttal did NOT DEFEND their position.
Concluding Statement

Level 4

The concluding statement SUMMARIZED the team's viewpoint, and LISTED their 2 major points in a clever and interesting way.
Level 3

The concluding statement
SUMMARIZED the team's viewpoint, and LISTED 1 major points in a CLEVER and INTERESTING way.
Level 2

The concluding statement SUMMARIZED the team's viewpoint, and LISTED 1 major points in a manner which was NOT CONVINCING.
Level 1

The concluding statement did NOT summarize the team's viewpoint, and did NOT identify a point .
Respect for Other Team

Level 4

ALL statements and responses were respectful and appropriate. NEVER interrupted or talked over other team members.
Level 3

MOST statements and responses were respectful and appropriate. OCCASIONALLY interrupted or talked over other team members.
Level 2

MOST statements and responses were respectful and appropriate. OFTEN interrupted or talked over other team members.
Level 1

NO statements and responses were respectful. OFTEN interrupted other team or talked over other team members.






Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98