- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Live Performance Review rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Live Performance Review Live Performance Review Rubric Code: DX3CW6A By grandmapatts Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Music Type: Writing Grade Levels: 6-8, 9-12

Live Performance Review Rubric
	Excellent Quality 20 pts	Standard Quality 10 pts	Quality Needs Improvement 5 pts	Incomplete 0 pts
Summary	Excellent Quality Paragraph includes a brief overview of the beginning, middle, and end of the performance. Reader has no difficulty knowing what the basics of the performance are.	Standard Quality Paragraph included a brief overview of most of the elements of the performance, but was missing one. Reader can grasp most of what the performance is.	Quality Needs Improvement Summary only highlighted one part of the performance (beginning, middle, or end). Reader has a hard time figuring out what the performance is.	Incomplete Summary was missing, incoherent, or wrong. Reader cannot ascertain what the performance is about from the review.
Performance Evaluation	Excellent Quality The critique of the performance is thoughtful. Writer gives evidence to support their statements. It includes insightful detail.	Standard Quality The critique is average, including some detail but not much depth. The writer uses some detail to support their statements.	Quality Needs Improvement The review includes some reference to the performance. It makes observations without supporting their statements with examples.	Incomplete There is no evaluation of the performance or evaluation is incomplete and unspecific.
Technical Elements	Excellent Quality Review addresses technical details such as tone, lighting, costumes in detail. Evaluates how they were used and their effectiveness.	Standard Quality Review addresses some technical aspects. Could have used more detail. Evaluates how they were used and their effectiveness.	Quality Needs Improvement Describes technical details but does not evaluate how they were used or their effectiveness.	Incomplete Review is missing a description of the technical details.
Execution and Editing	Excellent Quality Review is well written. With no errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, etc. It is thoughtful and shows obvious use of time and effort.	Standard Quality Review is well written with few errors. It is thoughtful and shows some use effort. A little more time would make it perfect.	Quality Needs Improvement Review has numerous errors. More time and effort needs to be displayed.	Incomplete Review is incomplete. Shows lack of effort. Writer needs to give review more time and effort.