iRubric: WHS Written Proposal rubric

Buildings placed without regard to the terrain. Not all areas drawn in. Drawing is a draft version.

Site plan does not make good use of the land, but all areas of the school are accounted for. Building is not drawn to scale. Some areas not included. Drawings are neat.

Site plan makes good use of the land. Most of the drawing is done to a consistant scale. Most areas associated with the school are included. Drawing is neat.

Site Plan makes the best use of the available land. Plan is drawn to scale and includes all areas associated with the school, is neat and "professional"

Model does not match area on the drawing. Area is not made to scale. Easy area is modeled.

Some interpretation of the area is needed to clarify the model. Not all parts scaled the same or parts left out. An easier area was chosen to model.

Clearly shows depicted area. All parts are not scaled the same. Not the easiest area in the design.

Clearly shows depicted area. All parts are scaled correctly including furniture. Not the easiest area in the design.

Not well thought out Does not follow any logical order. proposal sloppy and incomplete. calculations are incorrect.

Proposal is not in a logical order. No reasons given for design. Cost calculations are not supported by details.

Proposal is well thought out and follows a logical order. reasons for design is explained. Calculations are mostly correct, and shown in detail.

Reasons for design choices clearly explained. Clear explanation for how layout supports the intended function for each area. Calculations are shown in detail and are correct. Written proposal is "Professional" and supported with graphics.