iRubric: Wiki Rubric

Content is well organized, using headings (those given in the research guide) or bulleted lists to group related material.
Makes excellent use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance the presentation.
No misspellings or grammatical errors. No HTML errors in wiki (e.g., broken links, missing images).

Content uses headings or bulleted lists to organize, but the overall organization of topics appears flawed.
Makes good use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance to presentation.
Three or fewer misspellings and/or mechanical errors. No more than two HTML errors in the student's contribution to the wiki.

Content is logically organized for the most part.
Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors.
Makes use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. but occasionally these detract from the presentation content.
Four misspellings and/or grammatical errors. No more than four HTML errors in the student's contribution to the wiki.

There was no clear or logical organizational structure, just lots of facts.
Content is minimal, OR there are several factual errors.
Makes use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. but these often distract from the presentation content.
More than four errors in spelling or grammar. Five or more HTML errors in the student's contribution to the wiki.

The content is obviously written by the student and the student has shown a good depth of understanding and knowledge.

The content shows that the student has read, understood and rewritten the topic

The content shows short entries that are for the most part relevant to the topic. Page shows some depth or level of understanding. Some sections are cut and paste and/or show superficial rewriting.

Entries are short and frequently irrelevant to the topic. Most sections are cut and paste and/or show superficial rewriting. Shows little understanding.