Skip to main content

iRubric: Persuasive Literary Analysis Essay rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Persuasive Literary Analysis Essay 
Analyzing Themes through characterization, symbolism and figurative language in Their Eyes Were Watching God.
Rubric Code: D3CAW3
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Persuasive Essay
  Needs Improvement

4 pts

Average

7 pts

Excellent

10 pts

Logical Order

Needs Improvement

Paper was not logically organized. Introduction, body and conclusion were not evident. The paper lacked organization into clear topics of discussion. A large part of the writing prompt was not answered. The Jane Shaffer method is not used at all.
Average

Paper was organized poorly. Introduction, body, and conclusion are in developing stages. The topics are divided, but not clearly. Most of the writing prompt was answered. The Jane Shaffer method is used incorrectly.
Excellent

Paper was organized well. Introduction, body, and conclusion are evident. The topics are clearly divided and integrated well together. All components of the writing prompt are answered. The Jane Shaffer method is used correctly in the essay.
Argument/Voice

Needs Improvement

The paper has no or very few arguments. It is not persuasive in nature.
Average

The paper has some good arguments. It does a fairly good job of persuading the reader.
Excellent

The paper has a clear and definite argument. The paper does a very good job of persuading the reader. The essay effectively explains the theme of tolerance and acceptance using two examples each of characterization, symbolism, and figurative language.
Sentence Variation

Needs Improvement

There are almost no varied sentence patterns. Quotes are not integrated properly, or at all.
Average

Varied sentence patterns are developing. Quotes are mostly integrated properly. There is only one quote per body paragraph. They are not fully explained.
Excellent

Varied sentence patterns are clearly evident. Quotes are integrated properly. There are two quotes per body paragraph at least. They are explained properly.
Vocabulary

Needs Improvement

The paper includes no diverse language. It is not appropriate for the assignment or the audience. The vocabulary is not challenging. Much of the language is ambiguous.
Average

The paper includes somewhat diverse language. It is mostly appropriate for the assignment and audience. The vocabulary is mildly challenging. Some language is ambiguous.
Excellent

The paper includes diverse and scholarly language. The language is appropriate for the assignment and the audience. The vocabulary is challenging and concise.
Transitions

Needs Improvement

The paper has no transitions.
Average

The paper has a few transitions. Transitions are developing.
Excellent

The paper has smooth and effective transitions throughout the paper.
Conventions/Grammar

Needs Improvement

The paper contains 5 or more grammatical errors. It does not flow and has significant errors.
Average

The paper contains 2-4 grammatical errors. It flows fairly well and has minor errors.
Excellent

The paper contains 1 or less grammatical errors. It flows well and has no glaring errors.
Core Criteria
  Needs Improvement

5 pts

Average

15 pts

Excellent

20 pts

Evidence

Needs Improvement

The paper contains 1 ore no quotes from the novel. MLA formatting is done incorrectly. The quotes are not integrated into the paper.
Average

The paper contains at least 2 quotes from the novel. MLA formatting is used correctly most of the time. The quotes are inefficiently integrated into the paper. Commentary is not present in all cases.
Excellent

The paper contains at least 4 quotes from the novel. They are formatted according to MLA format. They are correctly integrated into the paper. The Jane Shaffer method is clearly used.
Formatting

Needs Improvement

Paper is not formatted correctly. The font type and/or size is incorrect. The heading is incorrect. The paper is missing part or all of the header. The paper is not double spaced.
Average

The paper is mostly formatted correctly.
Excellent

The paper is formatted perfectly. with heading, double spacing and MLA format of paragraphs & margins.




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n224