iRubric: Magnet Wiki Project & Science Journal Final Assessment rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Magnet Wiki Project & Science Journal Final Assessment

Final Assessment for Unit of Study on Magnets-Grade 3

Rubric Code: D32775

By jlandry17

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Science

Type: Project

Grade Levels: (none)

Magnet Wiki Project & Science Journ
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts
Description of Magnet Types	Poor Student has identified different types of magnets, but does not include valid descriptions or uses: 1. Horseshoe 2. Bar 3. Disk 4. Electromagnet	Fair Student has identified different types of magnets an has provided valid descriptions of each, but lacks examples of uses in everyday life: 1. Horseshoe 2. Bar 3. Disk 4. Electromagnet	Good Student has identified different types of magnets and has provided valid descriptions and examples of how they are used in everyday life: 1. Horseshoe 2. Bar 3. Disk 4. Electromagnet
Key Terms	Poor Key Terms are not defined or used in descriptions of magnets: 1. Magnetism 2. Poles 3. Attract 4. Repel 5. Magnetic field	Fair Key Terms are defined but not used in descriptions of magnets: 1. Magnetism 2. Poles 3. Attract 4. Repel 5. Magnetic field	Good Key Terms are defined and used effectively in descriptions of magnets: 1. Magnetism 2. Poles 3. Attract 4. Repel 5. Magnetic field
Experiment	Poor Student has not included instructions to conduct an experiment (including solution)using one of the different type of magnets described. OR Experiment used was conducted in class during study.	Fair Student has included instructions to conduct an experiment but is not clearly stated or easily followed(including solution)using one of the different type of magnets described. Experiments conducted in class cannot be used.	Good Student has included instructions that are clearly stated and easily followed to conduct an experiment (including solution)using one of the different type of magnets described. Experiments conducted in class cannot be used.
Wiki Appearance	Poor Content is provided, but not clearly stated and is not well researched. Graphics are not included for visual illustrations of descriptions given.	Fair Content is provided, but not clearly stated and is not well researched. Graphics are included for visual illustrations of descriptions given.	Good Content is clearly and accurately stated and is well researched. Graphics are included for visual illustrations of descriptions given.
Presentation	Poor Student's presentation skills were poor and seemed unfamiliar with material being explained.	Fair Student's presentation skills were good but seemed unfamiliar with material being explained.	Good Student's presentation skills were excellent and projected confidence in material being explained.
Collaboration	Poor Student did not collaborate well with group members and did not particpate in the project.	Fair Student collaborated well with group members but did not participate in the project as directed.	Good Student collaborated well with group members and fully participated in the project.
Science Journal	Poor Science Journal has missing assignments from unit of study and is not organized properly or in an orderly manner.	Fair Science Journal has missing assignments from unit of study but is organized chronologically in a neat and orderly manner.	Good Science Journal contains all completed assignments from unit of study and is organized chronologically in a neat and orderly manner.

Keywords:

Magnets, Grade 3, Final Assessment

Subjects:

Science

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric