- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Discussion rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Discussion Discussion The Discussion Board is intended to foster a collaborative sharing and discussion that stems from the participants engagement with course materials, one another, and the facilitator. Participants are expected to reflect on their understandings of the concepts, ideas and responses to one another based upon the course materials, and their own practice and experience. Rubric Code: D2X6586 By art818 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Education Type: (Other) Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Discussion Board Enter rubric description
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts
Contribution Contribution to the Learning Community	Poor Contribution does not meet the assigned criteria. Does not make an effort to participate in the community as it develops.	Fair Contribution meets the assigned criteria for contributions to the discussions. Interacts freely and encourages others in the community	Good Contribution exceeds assigned criteria and frequently prompts further discussion of a topic. Takes a leadership role in discussions. Actively contributes to collaborative learning.
Initial Post Initial Posting: Critical Analysis of Issues	Poor Does not relate to the assigned discussion topic. Post contains little connection to module concepts or required readings.	Fair Relates to the assigned discussion topic with evidence of critical thinking. Summarizes but does not support content using information from module concepts or required readings	Good Demonstrates critical thinking to analyze and relate key points. Supports content with module concepts or required readings
Response Responses: Quality of Learning for Colleagues and Self	Poor Provides agreement without substance or connection to module concepts or required reading. Demonstrates little evidence of personal learning as a result of interaction with colleagues	Fair Provides specific, constructive, and supportive feedback to colleagues. Refers to sources from readings. Demonstrates evidence of personal learning as a result of interaction with colleagues.	Good Provides specific, constructive, and supportive feedback to extend colleagues’ thinking. Encourages continued and deeper discussion. Offers additional resources or experiences.