Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Engineering a Balloon Powered Car rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Engineering a Balloon Powered Car
Engineering a Pendulum Swing
Rubric Code:
D22A6BX
By
ktwoody1
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Science
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
K-5
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Engineering a Balloon Powered Car
Outstanding
10 pts
Excellent
7 pts
Good
4 pts
Needs Improvement
1 pts
Paperwork
Outstanding
Student carefully completes all notes, design and data collection worksheets.
Student writes clearly), testing data is clear. Student finalizes project by completing Step 4 reflection. Step 4 clearly identifies claim, evidence, and reasoning.
Excellent
Student completes all notes, design and data collection worksheets.
Student writes somewhat neatly, testing data is somewhat clear. Student finalizes project by completing Step 4 reflection. Step 4 identifies claim, evidence, and reasoning but is not easily understood.
Good
Student completes some notes, design and data collection worksheets.
Student writing is messy and difficult to read.Testing data is unclear and incomplete. Student started the Step 4 reflection, but it is incomplete.
Needs Improvement
Student has incomplete notes, design and/or data collection worksheets.
Student writing is difficult to read. Testing data is unclear, incomplete or missing. Student did not complete Step 4 reflection.
Materials
Outstanding
Student writes identifies all materials used with specifications (measurements).
Excellent
Student identifies most materials used with most specifications (measurements) are listed.
Good
Student identifies some of the materials used with some specifications (measurements) listed.
Needs Improvement
Student fails to identify materials used. No specifications (measurements) are listed.
Testing Structure Data Sheet
Outstanding
Student carefully completes the Testing The Structure Data Collection sheet. Student writes clearly.
Analyzing The Data is clear and concise and provides suitable suggestions for design changes.
Excellent
Student completes the Testing The Structure Data Collection sheet. Student writes somewhat neatly.
Analyzing The Data is not easily understood. Design changes are offered, but incomplete or unclear.
Good
Student completes part of the Testing The Structure Data Collection sheet. Writing is messy and difficult to read.
Analyzing The Data is incomplete with no suggestions for design changes.
Needs Improvement
Testing The Structure Data Collection sheet is missing or incomplete. Writing is difficult to read. Data is unclear and hard to understand.
Analyzing The Data is incomplete with no suggestions for design changes.
Procedure
Outstanding
Student creates a clear procedure that provides all data relevant to the question OR student successfully analyzes how the procedure could be changed to yield relevant data if repeated. Procedure is detailed enough to be replicated by others.
Excellent
Student creates a procedure that provides most data relevant to the question OR student attempts to analyze how the procedure could be changed to yield relevant data if repeated. Procedure may not be detailed enough to be replicated by others.
Good
Student creates a procedure that provides some relevant data BUT student does not attempt to analyze how the procedure could be changed to yield relevant data. Procedure is not detailed enough to be replicated by others.
Needs Improvement
Student creates a procedure that yields minimal to no data. Student does not attempt to analyze the procedure for improvement.
Teamwork
Outstanding
All students have an equal role in designing and implementing the experiment.
Excellent
Good
Needs Improvement
One student took over designing and implementing the experiment allowing little input from team member(s). One team member is bossy.
-----
The other team member allowed partner to take over, did not offer help, or help was denied and did not stand up for self.
Subjects:
Science
Types:
Project
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Science rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.