Skip to main content

- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Psychology Team Presentation rubric

iRubric: Psychology Team Presentation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Psychology Team Presentation Psychology Team Presentation Rubric Code: D22A33C By IBUPSY Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Business Type: Presentation Grade Levels: Undergraduate

NonVerbal Skills
	Excellent 6 pts	Very Good 5 pts	Good 4 pts	Fair 3 pts	Needs Improvement 2 pts	Poor 1 pts
Eye Contact	Excellent All team members held the attention of entire audience with the use of direct eye contact, seldom looking at notes or visual aids.	Very Good Most team members held the attention of entire audience with the use of direct eye contact, seldom looking at notes or visual aids.	Good Most team members had consistent use of direct eye contact with audience, but still returns to notes or reads from visual aids.	Fair Most team members displayed minimal eye contact with audience, while reading mostly from the notes or from reads from visual aids.	Needs Improvement All team members displayed minimal eye contact with audience, while reading mostly from the notes or from reads from visual aids.	Poor None of the team members made eye contact with audience, as entire presentation is read from notes and/or visual aids.
Body Language	Excellent All team members had movements which seem fluid and help the audience visualize.	Very Good Most team members had movements which seem fluid and help the audience visualize.	Good Most team members made movements or gestures that enhances articulation.	Fair Most team members had very little movement or descriptive gestures.	Needs Improvement All team members had very little movement or descriptive gestures.	Poor No movement or descriptive gestures were displayed by any of the team members.
Poise	Excellent All team members displayed relaxed, sself-confident nature about self, with no mistakes.	Very Good Most team members displayed relaxed, sself-confident nature about self, with no mistakes.	Good Most team members make minor mistakes but quickly recovers from them; Most team members display little or no tension.	Fair Most team members displyed mild tension; some members had trouble recovering from mistakes.	Needs Improvement All team members displyed mild tension and had trouble recovering from mistakes.	Poor All team members showed obvious tension and nervousness and had trouble recovering from mistakes.
Verbal Skills
	Excellent 6 pts	Very Good 5 pts	Good 4 pts	Fair 3 pts	Needs Improvement 2 pts	Poor 1 pts
Enthusiasm	Excellent All team members demonstrated a strong positive feeling about topic during entire presentation.	Very Good Most team members demonstrated a strong positive feeling about topic during entire presentation.	Good All team members occasionally showed positive feelings about the topic.	Fair Most team members occasionally showed positive feelings about the topic.	Needs Improvement Some team members showed some negativity toward topic presented.	Poor All team members absolutely showed no interest in topic presented.
Delivery	Excellent All team members used a clear voice and correct, precise pronunciation of terms so that all audience members can hear the presentation.	Very Good Most team members used a clear voice and correct, precise pronunciation of terms so that all audience members can hear the presentation.	Good Most team members' voice is clear. Most team members pronouced most words correctly. Most audience members can hear the presentation.	Fair Some team members' voice is low and some team members pronounced terms incorrctly. Audience members have difficulty hearing the presentation.	Needs Improvement All team members' voice is low and all team members pronounced terms incorrctly. Audience members have difficulty hearing the presentation.	Poor All team members mumbled during the presentation, incorrectly pronounced terms, and spoke too quietly for majority of the audience to hear.
Content
	Excellent 6 pts	Very Good 5 pts	Good 4 pts	Fair 3 pts	Needs Improvement 2 pts	Poor 1 pts
Subject Knowledge	Excellent All team members demostrated full knowledge by answering all class questions with explanations and elaboration.	Very Good Most team members demostrated full knowledge by answering all class questions with explanations and elaboration.	Good Most team members is at ease with expected answers to all questions, without elabortion.	Fair Some team members seemed uncomfortable with information and is able to answer only rudimentary questions.	Needs Improvement All team members seemed uncomfortable with information and is able to answer only rudimentary questions.	Poor All team members do not have grasp of the information; team members are unable to answer questions about the subject presented.
Organization	Excellent All the information was presented in a logical, interesting sequence which audience can follow.	Very Good Most of the information presented was in a logical, interesting sequence which audience can follow.	Good Most of the information was presented in a logical sequence which the audience can follow.	Fair Audience had some difficulty following the presentation because team members jumped around a little during the presentation.	Needs Improvement Audience had difficulty following the presentation becauase the team members jumped around a lot during the presentation.	Poor Audience cannot understand presentation because their is no sequence of information.
Mechanics/Visual Aid	Excellent Presentation had no misspellings or grammatical errors.	Very Good Presentation had no more than 2 misspellings and/or grammatical errors.	Good Presentation had no more than 3 misspellings and/or grammatical errors.	Fair Presentation had no more than 4 misspellings and/or grammatical errors.	Needs Improvement Presentation had no more than 5 misspellings and/or grammatical errors.	Poor Presentation had 5 or more misspellings and/or grammatical errors.
Creativity	Excellent Presentation was extremely creative, well thought out, and very interesting. Team did an excellent job.	Very Good Presentation was very creative and very interesting. Team did a very good job.	Good Presentation was creative and interesting. Team did a good job.	Fair Presentation was somewhat creative and somewhat interesting. Team did a fair job.	Needs Improvement Presentation was not very creative, but somewhat interesting. Team needs improvement in this area.	Poor Presentation was not creative, nor interesting. Team did poor.
Participation
Contribution by Each Team Member	Excellent Superb team players. All team members go out of their way to help the rest of the team in any way they can to address audience questions, get over glitches during their presentations, etc., but doing all this as unobtrusively as possible	Very Good Very good team players. Most team players are interested in the presentations by the other team members; team members make a definite effort to ensure the success of the overall team presentation by frequently helping the rest of the team respond to audience questions.	Good Good team players. Some team members showed interest in the presentations by the other team members; some team mambers make an effort to ensure the success of the overall team presentation by occasionally helping the rest of the team respond to audience questions.	Fair Team members mainly focused on his/her portion of the presentation; responds when another team member asks him/her a direct question but otherwise does not attempt to help other team members address audience questions.	Needs Improvement Some team members seemed to have no interest in the presentations by the other members of the team; occasionally gets into arguments with the other members.	Poor All team members seemed to have no interest in the presentations by the other members of the team; continous conflict and rguments occus with the other members.

Subjects:

Business

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Business rubrics

More Presentation rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.

n98