Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Monroe Speech rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Monroe Speech
Rubric Code:
CXW2532
By
rundomatic
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Communication
Type:
Assessment
Grade Levels:
(none)
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Enter rubric title
Outstanding
4 pts
Good
3 pts
Fair
2 pts
Poor
1 pts
Body Movement
Outstanding
Stands straight & still. Uses movements & posture to add to their message.
Good
Either uses meaningful movements or does not shift or lean.
Fair
Uses no meaningful movements & leans or shifts weight.
Poor
Posture or movement interferes or distracts from presentation.
Eye contact
Outstanding
Maintains consistent eye contact with entire audience.
Good
Maintains eye contact with most of audience; most of the time.
Fair
Only occasionally looks at audience.
Poor
Has no eye contact with audience.
Facial Expression
Outstanding
Consistently uses facial expressions that enhance their message.
Good
Facial expressions are natural & positive
Fair
Little variance in facial expression.
Poor
Uses no facial expressions.
Gestures
Outstanding
Uses purposeful & natural gestures that compliment the message.
Good
Uses gestures in the presentation.
Fair
Uses no gestures in the presentation.
Poor
Gestures contradict or distract from the message
Volume
Outstanding
Speaks loudly & comfortably to be heard by entire audience.
Good
Speaks loudly enough to be heard by most audience members.
Fair
Speaks softly causing some audience discomfort.
Poor
Cannot be heard
Rate
Outstanding
Varies rate & pauses for natural effect throughout presentation.
Good
Uses appropriate rate but may have some pauses that do not create distractions.
Fair
Speaks too rapidly or slowly; pauses may interfere with smoothness of rate.
Poor
Rate causes confusion for audience.
Fluency
Outstanding
Speaks fluently & consistently avoids vocal fillers (um, uh)
Good
Speaks fluently with occasional vocal fillers that do not create distractions.
Fair
Vocal fillers are noticeable & may interfere with fluency.
Poor
Vocal fillers create distractions.
Expression
Outstanding
Speaks with vocal expression & enthusiasm to create interest & attention.
Good
Speaks with natural vocal expression, but needs more enthusiasm.
Fair
Speaks with some vocal expression or enthusiasm.
Poor
Speaks with little or no expression or enthusiasm.
Articulation
Outstanding
Enunciates & pronounces clearly & accurately throughout the presentation
Good
Enunciates & pronounces clearly & accurately with only minimal distractions.
Fair
Either enunciation or pronunciation creates distractions.
Poor
Enunciation and/or pronunciation are creating major distractions.
Language
Outstanding
Uses language & grammar that enhance audience understanding.
Good
Uses clear language & proper grammar.
Fair
Uses language that is awkward & creates some discomfort or confusion.
Poor
Language choices were not accurate, sensitive or appropriate for the audience and/or occasion.
Persuasive Technique
Credibility
Outstanding
The speaker uses their own experiences & research to create their credibility to speak on this issue.
Good
The speaker uses either their experiences or research to create credibility.
Fair
The speaker establishes limited credibility.
Poor
The speaker does not establish their credibility.
Quality of Support
Outstanding
Resources & details are topic relevant, and cited.
Good
Resources & details are topic relevant, but not all were cited.
Fair
Resources & details are topic relevant, none were cited.
Poor
No Logical appeal given
Emotional Appeal
Outstanding
Strong connection was made with audience
Good
Connection somewhat made with audience
Fair
Emotional connection was lacking with Aud.
Poor
No emotional appeal given
Organization
Attention
Outstanding
The attention-
getter is topical, interesting, & time & audience appropriate.
Good
The attention-
getter is topical & audience appropriate, & is either interesting or time appropriate.
Fair
The attention – getter may be topical & appropriate, but needs to be more interesting & time appropriate.
Poor
The attention – getter is not topic & audience appropriate.
Thesis
Outstanding
The topic & purpose are clearly stated
Good
Either the topic or purpose is clearly stated.
Fair
The speaker attempted to state the topic or purpose.
Poor
Topic & purpose are not stated.
Preview
Outstanding
The main points are clearly identified & established.
Good
The main points are listed.
Fair
The main points are partially listed.
Poor
The main points are missing or unclear.
Body Organization
Outstanding
The speaker signals & follows MMS organizational pattern.
Good
The speaker uses MMS pattern, but in wrong order.
Fair
The speaker attempts to use MMS pattern.
Poor
The speaker appears to use no organizational / persuasive pattern.
Ctiation of sources
Outstanding
Authorship, source, date, & relevance of all support are clearly orally referenced.
Good
Authorship, source & date are clearly orally referenced.
Fair
Sources & dates of the information is not orally referenced.
Poor
Authorship is not orally referenced.
Internal body Org
Outstanding
A logical, clear & balanced sub-structure is utilized within each point.
Good
A logical & clear sub-structure is used in most points.
Fair
A sub-structure is utilized in many of the points.
Poor
Sub-structure is either unclear or not developed in many points.
Transitions
Outstanding
Oral & physical transitions are used to signal moving from one idea to the next.
Good
Transitions were vague and hard to follow.
Fair
Few transitions are used.
Poor
Transitions are not used.
Review / Restate
Outstanding
Closure is signaled by reviewing & applying the main points to the purpose statement.
Good
Closure is signaled by restating the purpose statement & main points.
Fair
Either the purpose statement or main points are not clearly restated.
Poor
No restatements are made.
Closer
Outstanding
Rhetorical devices are used to provide a final appeal that unifies the entire speech & reminds the audience of the significance & relevancy of the topic
Good
A clear final appeal is used to conclude the presentation & reminds the audience of significance or relevancy of the topic.
Fair
The close of the presentation is signaled or contains a final appeal.
Poor
The presentation ends abruptly or incompletely.
Enter Title
Visual Aide
Outstanding
The presentation ends abruptly or incompletely.
Good
Enhance the message & are neatly prepared & accurate.
Fair
Enhance the message, but are not neatly prepared and/or accurate.
Poor
No visual or audio aids were used during body of speech.
Time
Outstanding
The speaker exactly meets the time expectations.
Good
The speaker meets time expectations within the allowable limits.
Fair
The presentation was near time expectations, but did not meet the time limits.
Poor
The speaker does not meet time expectations. The speaker needs to talk longer/shorter.
outline
Outstanding
Outline was written word for word, sources were cited correctly.
Good
Outline was written word for word, not all sources were cited correctly
Fair
Outline was written in key word format, sources were cited correctly
Poor
Outline was written in key word format and sources were not correctly cited
Subjects:
Communication
Types:
Assessment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Communication rubrics
More Assessment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.