Skip to main content
iRubric: Article Blog Response 2019 rubric

iRubric: Article Blog Response 2019 rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Article Blog Response 2019 
Article Discussion HW Rubric
Rubric Code: CXCBWX8
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Article Blog Response
  Exceptional - A

4 pts

Proficient - B

3 pts

Approaching - C/D

2 pts

Needs Work - F

1 pts

Scoring

(N/A)

Intro/Thesis

Exceptional - A

The introduction has a thesis that makes a compelling, arguable claim and takes a purposeful position on an issue. The body has a structure and organization that is carefully crafted to support the claim. Writer consistently addresses audience's knowledge level, concerns, and biases about the claim.
Proficient - B

The introduction has a thesis that makes a clear, arguable claim and takes a position. The body has a structure and organization that is aligned with the claim. Writer considers audience's knowledge level and concerns about the claim.
Approaching - C/D

The introduction has a thesis that makes an unclear or emerging claim that suggests a vague position. The body attempts a structure and organization to support the position. Writer displays some awareness of audience's knowledge level and concerns.
Needs Work - F

The introduction may or may not have a thesis that makes an unclear claim and/or vague position. The body has limited structure and organization. Writer is aware of audience but seems unconcerned with audience's needs.
Scoring
Ideas/Supporting arguments

Exceptional - A

The body provides convincing and relevant information and evidence to advance the claim and skillfully addresses counterclaim. Each argument is clearly focused with a topic sentence. The conclusion effectively advances the claim and evidence and demonstrates a clear call to action.
Proficient - B

The body provides information and evidence to support the claim and addresses counterclaim, in a formulaic manner. The conclusion reinforces the claim, summarizes evidence, and includes a functional call-to-action.
Approaching - C/D

The body provides some information and evidence that attempts to support the claim and may attempt to address counterclaim. The conclusion restates the claim or position and may/may not include a call-to-action.
Needs Work - F

The body contains limited information and evidence related to the claim and counterclaims or lacks counterclaims. The text may fail to conclude the argument or position.
Scoring
Organization

Exceptional - A

The organization enhances the central idea(s) and its development. The order and structure are artful and compelling, move the reader through the text easily.
Proficient - B

Organization is clear and coherent. Order and structure are present, but may seem formulaic.
Approaching - C/D

Attempt has been made to organize the writing; however, the overall structure is inconsistent or skeletal.
Needs Work - F

The writing lacks a clear organizational structure. The writing is difficult to follow and the reader has to reread substantial portions, or the piece is simply too short to demonstrate organizational skills.
Scoring
Word Choice

Exceptional - A

Words convey the intended message in an exceptionally interesting, precise, and natural way appropriate to audience and purpose. Uses rich, broad range of action verbs, vivid adjectives, and precise nouns which have been carefully chosen and thoughtfully placed.
Proficient - B

Words effectively convey the intended message. The writer employs a variety of words that are functional and appropriate to audience and purpose. Writer uses some action verbs, vivid adjectives, and precise nouns, although these may be forced.
Approaching - C/D

Language is quite ordinary, lacking interest, precision and variety, or may be inappropriate to audience and purpose in places. The writer attempts to employ action verbs, vivid adjectives, and precise nouns.
Needs Work - F

Language is monotonous and/or misused, detracting from the meaning and impact. The writer may or may not attempt the use of action verbs, vivid adjectives, and precise nouns.
Scoring
Grammar/Conventions

Exceptional - A

Expert control of standard writing conventions (e.g., punctuation, spelling, capitalization, grammar, etc. ) is evident. Subtle errors can easily be skimmed right over unless specifically searching for them.
Proficient - B

A functional control of standard writing conventions (e.g., punctuation, spelling, capitalization, grammar, etc.) is evident. Some noticeable errors 2-3, but these do not impede readability.
Approaching - C/D

A limited control of standard writing conventions (e.g., punctuation, spelling, capitalization, grammar, etc.) is evident. Errors (4 or more) begin to impede readability.
Needs Work - F

Little control of standard writing conventions is evident. Frequent, significant errors impede readability. Does not identify comma uses.
Scoring

Final Grade

/20



Keywords:
  • Persuasive Writing

Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16