Skip to main content
iRubric: Personal Manifesto rubric

iRubric: Personal Manifesto rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Personal Manifesto 
Rubric Code: CXBA83C
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Personal Manifesto
  Great Work

20 pts

Emerging

15 pts

Needs improvement

10 pts

TEKS (for teacher only)

(N/A)

Thought Process: Content

Great Work

Content is thoughtful, personalized and rooted in research. Exhibits evidence of understanding of research in philosophy, history, and human nature through examples and original analysis. Makes strong connections from each item to GOW (and/or Mother C if applicable) and their own worldview.
Emerging

Content is thoughtful, personalized and references research. Exhibits evidence of basic understanding of philosophy, history, and human nature through examples and analysis. Makes connections from each item to GOW and/or Mother C if applicable and their own worldview.
Needs improvement

Content relies heavily on summary of texts and restating of facts. Shows lack of understanding of texts and facts. Is not personalized, seems more like a report. No analysis is evident.
TEKS (for teacher only)

(2) A, C (4) (6) (8) (9) (10) (13) (14) (16)
Written: Style and Conventions

Great Work

Text is majority error free grammatically. Style shows firm grasp of syntax and voice. Text is assertive, persuasive and concise. Diction shows care and accurate vocabulary.
Emerging

Text has few errors grammatically. Style shows a decent grasp of syntax and voice. Text is persuasive and clear. Some attention to diction is evident.
Needs improvement

Text has grammatical errors that make comprehension difficult. Has the feel of a rough draft: in need of editing, poor conventions, no structure or form, rambles without purpose.
TEKS (for teacher only)

(13) (14) (16) (17) (18) (19)
Collaboration

Great Work

Critical friends were productive: constructive criticism was given and taken professionally and consistently; pairs engaged in discourse to help each other create meaning and deeper connections. Positive partner ratings on both sides.
Emerging

Critical friends were mostly productive: constructive criticism was given and taken professionally and intermittently; pairs sometimes engaged in discourse. Positive partner ratings on both sides.
Needs improvement

Critical friends were not productive: consistent distractions and off task behavior or no interaction at all. Agency was depleted through the relationship, little to no discussion or discourse. Negative partner ratings.
TEKS (for teacher only)

(24) (26)
Agency

Great Work

Developed their own timeline/schedule and stuck to it. Hit all benchmarks on time and showing substantial progress.
Emerging

Developed own schedule/timeline, hit benchmarks on time and showed adequate progress.
Needs improvement

Did not develop a schedule or timeline, consistently did not hit benchmarks on time, or showed very little progress each time.
TEKS (for teacher only)

(20) developing a research plan.
Research

Great Work

Clear research question. Research gathered from a large variety of texts and media. Over 10 sources examined, but shows organization, evaluation of relevance, and synthesis with research question and other texts. Cited accurately.
Emerging

Research gathered from less than 10 sources. Some variety in sources. Research question is somewhat clear. Findings are organized, but not evaluated or synthesized for usefulness or validity. Works cited mostly accurately.
Needs improvement

No research question. Less than 5 sources. No variety in sources. Findings are not organized and not relevant to topic. No evidence of synthesis or evaluation in the process. No works cited.
TEKS (for teacher only)

(21) (22)




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98