Skip to main content
iRubric: GCU STEM Impact Grant Canyon Showcase Rubric

iRubric: GCU STEM Impact Grant Canyon Showcase Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
GCU STEM Impact Grant Canyon Showcase Rubric 
GCU STEM Impact Grant Shark Tank Project Proposal Rubric
Project Title
Rubric Code: CXB86C3
By MarniLandry
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Engineering  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate, Graduate

Powered by iRubric Canyon Showcase Rubric
  Missing or Significantly Incomplete

1 pts

Needs Considerable Work

2 pts

Approaching

3 pts

Target

4 pts

STEM Integration

Missing or Significantly Incomplete

Science practices, Technology Integration, Engineering practices, and Math integration are not evident.

No evidence is presented to demonstrate the integration.
Needs Considerable Work

Science practices, Technology Integration, Engineering practices, and Math integration are inferred or only partially integrated.

Some evidence may be presented to demonstrate the integration
Approaching

Science practices, Technology Integration, Engineering practices, and Math integration are all evident, but not fully integrated.

Some evidence may be presented to demonstrate the integration
Target

Science practices, Technology Integration, Engineering practices, and Math were integrated into all aspects of the project.

Evidence is presented to demonstrate the integration.
Solution Implementation

Missing or Significantly Incomplete

The project is not complete

No evidence for implementation
Needs Considerable Work

The project is nearly complete, initial implementation may have begun.

Little or no evidence for implementation.
Approaching

The project was completed, but only partially implemented.

Anecdotal evidence presented to demonstrate the implementation.
Target

The project was fully implemented.

Evidence/data is presented to demonstrate the implementation
Budget

Missing or Significantly Incomplete

Students do not provide an explanation of the costs associated with the project.
Needs Considerable Work

Students provide a partial explanation of the costs associated with the project.
Approaching

Students provide an explanation of the costs associated with the project.
Target

Students provide a detailed and justified explanation of the costs associated with the project.
Stakeholder Involvement

Missing or Significantly Incomplete

No evidence of continual stakeholder feedback.

No evidence of feedback implementation.
Needs Considerable Work

Allusion to stakeholder feedback.

Allusion to feedback implementation.
Approaching

Some evidence presented of continual stakeholder feedback.

Anecdotal evidence of feedback implementation
Target

Clear and documented evidence of continual stakeholder feedback.

Evidence of repeated feedback implementation.
Teamwork

Missing or Significantly Incomplete

No description of teamwork dynamics and conflict resolution.

No evidence that project was student driven from start to finish.
Needs Considerable Work

Statement of teamwork, but no description of dynamics and conflict resolution.

Evidence that the students were involved (passively) in the project, but it was adult driven.
Approaching

Some description of teamwork dynamics and conflict resolution.


Evidence that the students were highly involved in the project, but it was more adult driven.
Target

Full description of teamwork dynamics and conflict resolution.

Evidence that project was student driven from start to finish.
Sustainability

Missing or Significantly Incomplete

No future steps of project are defined.

No concrete budget (including funding sources) and timeline presented for a 3+ year plan to sustain the project.
Needs Considerable Work

Vague future steps are mentioned.

Budget and timeline present but incomplete or not actionable.
Approaching

Future steps are defined. May not be clear or actionable.

Budget (without funding source) and timeline presented.
Target

Future actionable steps of project are clearly defined.

Concrete budget (including funding sources) and timeline presented for a 3+ year plan to sustain the project.



Keywords:
  • choice-based, proposal


Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16