- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: The Story of a Rock: Creative Project rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
The Story of a Rock: Creative Project The Story of a Rock: Creative Project A complete illustration and presentation of the Rock Cycle, including detailed explanations of erosion and weathering, and compaction and cementation, as it applies to the Rock Cycle. Rubric Code: CXB3B34 By Keeling Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Science Type: Presentation Grade Levels: 6-8

The Rock Cycle
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Content 40% ___x10	Poor Facts about the rock cycle are not included, incomplete or incorrect. Should include 3 main types of rock, why they are named that and the processes that form each type.	Fair Content is for the most part correct and complete. Includes 3 types of rock, and some explanation of the processes that result in the formation of each rock.	Good Content is covered completely with no errors. Includes 3 types of rock, and the detailed processes that result in the formation of each rock.	Excellent Content is covered completely with no errors. Includes 3 types of rock, an example of each type, and the detailed processes that result in the formation of each rock.
Neatness/ Grammar 20% ___x5	Poor Not legible or sloppy writing and or artwork.	Fair Project is moderately neat. Limited grammatical errors.	Good Project is neat. No grammatical errors.	Excellent The project looked professionally done.
Artwork/ Creativity 20% ___x5	Poor Poorly drawn/created, showing obvious signs of rushing or lack of effort.	Fair Project shows good effort and quality.	Good Artwork/project is very good. Obvious, high quality effort is shown. The students clearly worked with the information and displayed knowledge.	Excellent Project is excellent. Obvious high quality effort is displayed. The student knowledge and wit was impressive.
Group Work 20% ____x5 As a group increases in number to a maximum of 4. Level	Poor The level of work could have been completed by one person in the given time.	Fair Some members worked to their potential.	Good Students did not work at an excellent level as a group.	Excellent The individual or all group members worked to contribute to overall project advancement. Groups only used multiple technology applications in the formation of the final project.