Skip to main content
iRubric: Video Submission Rubric

iRubric: Video Submission Rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Video Submission Rubric 
Video Submission Rubric
This rubric is to assist in judging the 2017 Solve for Tomorrow video submissions.
Rubric Code: CXA3C3C
By lisakochaud
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: (Other)  
Grade Levels: 6-8, 9-12

Powered by iRubric Criteria Score
  Poor

5 pts

Fair

10 pts

Good

15 pts

Excellent

20 pts

Originality & Creativity

Poor

Video does not display originality, innovation or creativity.
Fair

Video has mainly non-original concepts and has little innovation or creativity.
Good

Video has mostly original content, shows moderate innovation and creativity.
Excellent

Video is entirely unique, creative, and innovative. Ideas and information are presented in an interesting way.
Content

Poor

Video does not identify a problem or a proposed STEAM solution.
Fair

Video provides a limited explanation of the problem and showcases a vague description of the STEAM solution.
Good

Video explains the problem being addressed in detail but only moderately explains proposed STEAM solution.
Excellent

Video clearly explains the problem and showcases the STEAM solution being proposed.
Community Impact

Poor

Video showcases no community impact. The project does not identify how the community will benefit and can only be partially executed.
Fair

Video showcases limited community impact. The video identifies how the community will benefit and a project that can be partially executed.
Good

Video showcases moderate potential for community impact. The project (1) identifies how the community will benefit, (2) can be executed and (3) may be continued after the contest.
Excellent

Video shows several, if not all students engaging in hand-on learning during the execution of the solution.
Student Involvement

Poor

The video does not feature student involvement.
Fair

Video features some students engaged in the presentation of information only. There is no hands-on learning.
Good

Video shows very limited student involvement in the implementation of the solution.
Excellent

Video shows several, if not all students engaging in hand-on learning during the execution of the solution.
Production

Poor

Video is not well planned. Poor sound and video. Video plays with errors. Music, images, websites are not credited properly.
Fair

Video shows very little planning. Sound and video quality are somewhat clear and play with some errors. Music, images, websites are credited properly.
Good

Video shows some planning. Sound and video quality allow for clear messaging and play without errors. Music, images, websites are credited properly.
Excellent

Video is well planned. Sound and video quality allow for clear messaging and play without errors. music, images, websites are credited properly.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16