Skip to main content
iRubric: Personal Leadership Development Plan BUSI5020 rubric

iRubric: Personal Leadership Development Plan BUSI5020 rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Personal Leadership Development Plan BUSI5020 
Personal Leadership Development Plan BUSI5020
This rubric is used for a graduate course in Ethics and Leadership in which the student is required to develop a Personal Leadership Development Plan
Rubric Code: CX99549
By burtonaggabao
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Business  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Personal Leadership Development
Personal Leadership Development Plan
  Poor

150 pts

Fair

250 pts

Good

300 pts

Students' Course Learning
50 pts

Provides additional insight into what each student has learned from the course.
Poor

Little to no insight of what was learned from this course as it relates to goals and leadership components.
Fair

Some insight of what was learned from this course as it relates to goals and leadership components, but additional development would be needed.
Good

Thorough insight of what was learned from this course as it relates to goals and leadership components, to include additional development and or self-exploration.
Self Analysis
50 pts

as compared to the personal goals
Poor

May mention some strengths and weaknesses, but there is nothing further discussed or there is no comparison to personal goals.
Fair

Analyzes ones own strengths and weaknesses, but may not contain additional development and self-exploration or comparison to personal goals.
Good

Effectively analyzes own strengths and weaknesses. This includes additional development and self-exploration of each key leadership component and comparison of personal goals.
Leadership Analysis
50 pts

A clear description of the various leadership approaches.
Poor

Does not list or describe or any of the key leadership approaches. Does not reflect on leadership approaches compared to life goals.
Fair

Describes at least 1 - 3 leadership approaches with analysis of strengths and weaknesses of approach. Defines a link between specific leadership approaches and life goals.
Good

Describes and uses 3 -5 key leadership approaches. Includes a thorough discussion of life goals as these link to leadership approaches.
Personal and Leadership Goals
50 pts

Personal and Leadership Development Goals
Poor

Brief discussion, or no discussion, of some personal development goals. Little additional development or insight.
Few or some of the SMART elements included.
Fair

Discussion of personal goals may or may not include both life and leadership development goals. May not have additional insight. At least three of the SMART elements included. Some aspect of ethical leadership discussed.
Good

Discussion on personal and leadership development goals to include a development of life and leadership goals. This development will be well-rounded and include additional insight. It will also include all of the SMART elements. Some aspect of ethical leadership discussed and integrated into the development plan.
Organization & Structure
25 pts

Enter criteria description
Poor

-Organization and structure detract from the message of the writer.<BR>
-Paragraphs are disjointed and lack transition of thoughts.
Fair

- Structure of the paper is not easy to follow.<BR>
- Paragraph transitions need improvement.-
Good

- Structure of the paper is clear and easy to follow.<BR>
- Paragraph transitions are present and logical and maintain the flow of thought throughout the paper.
Content and Development
25 pts

Enter criteria description
Poor

-Content is incomplete.<BR>
- Major points are not clear and / or persuasive.
Fair

- Major points are addressed, but not well supported.<BR>
- Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
Good

- Content is accurate.<BR>
- Major points are stated clearly and are well supported.<BR>
- Content and purpose of the writing are clear.
Formatting
25 pts

Enter criteria description
Poor

- Paper lacks many elements of correct formatting.<BR>
- Paper is inadequate/ excessive in length.<BR>
-MLA style is not used.
Fair

- Paper follows most guidelines.<BR>
- Paper is over/under word length.<BR>
- MLA Style or APA Style is used somewhat throughout.
Good

- Paper follows designated guidelines.<BR>
- Paper is the appropriate length as described for the assignment.<BR>
- MLA Style or APA Style is used consistently throughout.
Grammar, Punctuation, & Spelling
25 pts

Poor

- Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.<BR>
- Language used jargon or conversational tone.
Fair

- Paper contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors.<BR>
- Language lacks clarity or includes the use of some jargon or conversational tone.
Good

- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.<BR>
- Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98