Skip to main content
iRubric: Statistics Final Project rubric

iRubric: Statistics Final Project rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Statistics Final Project 
Final Statistics Project for a high school-level statistics course. The project will require students to determine the question of interest, create a survey, collect data, analyze the data, perform inference and provide a written report and presentation with conclusions/evaluations and give an oral report to the class.
Rubric Code: CX864W6
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Math  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 6-8, 9-12

Powered by iRubric Due Dates
  Excellent

5 pts

Good

4 pts

Fair

3 pts

Poor

2 pts

Grade

(N/A)

Survey Monkey Account Created

Excellent

Reported on time.
Good

1 day late.
Fair

2 days late.
Poor

3 or more days late.
Grade
Survey/Question

Excellent

Reported on time.
Good

1 day late.
Fair

2 days late.
Poor

3 or more days late.
Grade
Poster

Excellent

Reported on time.
Good

1 day late.
Fair

2 days late.
Poor

3 or more days late.
Grade
Presentation

Excellent

Reported on time.
Good

1 day late.
Fair

2 days late.
Poor

3 or more days late.
Grade
Statistics Project
  Excellent

(N/A)

Good

(N/A)

Fair

(N/A)

Poor

(N/A)

Grade

(N/A)

Survey/Question

Excellent

Question of interest is clearly capable of being investigated and results driven.
Good

Question of interest is capable of being investigated and results driven.
Fair

Question of interest is insignificant and lacking relevant information.
Poor

Question of interest is missing altogether from the assignment or the question has no relevance to the topic.
Grade
Poster

Excellent

The paper is clearly written within the given guidelines. There is a clear introduction, specific hypotheses that are comparable and testable, a solid data collection and analysis and a thorough conclusion/reflection that states what has been learned from this assignment. All relevant sources are cited appropriately.
Good

The paper is written within the given guidelines. There is an introduction, hypotheses that are comparable and testable, data collection and analysis and a conclusion/reflection that states what has been learned from this assignment. All relevant sources are cited.
Fair

The paper is lacking effort within the given guidelines. There is an introduction, hypotheses that are not comparable and testable, data collection and analysis that is not strong and a conclusion/reflection that does not validate what has been learned from this assignment. All relevant sources are not cited appropriately.
Poor

The paper is considerably lacking effort within the given guidelines. There is virtually no introduction, hypotheses that are not comparable and testable, data collection and analysis that is not strong and a conclusion/reflection that does not validate what has been learned from this assignment. All relevant sources are not cited appropriately or cited at all.
Grade
Presentation

Excellent

Presentation provides a thorough understanding of the topic selected and the research conducted to generate the necessary results. The results are thoroughly explained and clearly understood.
Good

Presentation provides an understanding of the topic selected and the research conducted to generate the necessary results. The results are explained and understood.
Fair

Presentation provides a minimal understanding of the topic selected and the research conducted to generate the necessary results. The results are somewhat explained and understood.
Poor

Presentation provides no understanding of the topic selected and the research conducted to generate the necessary results. The results are not thoroughly explained and not clearly understood.
Grade
Data Evaluation
  Excellent

(N/A)

Good

(N/A)

Fair

(N/A)

Poor

(N/A)

Grade

(N/A)

Analysis

Excellent

Data analysis was thorough and accurate in paper and presentation. All calculations are throughly displayed and computations are accurate.
Good

Data analysis was accurate in paper and presentation. All calculations are displayed and computations are accurate.
Fair

Data analysis was weak or incomplete in paper and presentation. Calculations are somewhat displayed and computations are flawed.
Poor

Data analysis in paper and presentation was very weak or non-existent. There were computational errors within the process that caused poor results.
Grade
Inference

Excellent

Data inference was thorough and accurate in paper and presentation. All calculations are throughly displayed and computations are accurate, leading to solid conclusions concerning the hypotheses.
Good

Data inference was accurate in paper and presentation. All calculations are displayed and computations are accurate, leading to conclusions concerning the hypotheses.
Fair

Data inference was weak or incomplete in paper and presentation. Calculations are somewhat displayed and computations are flawed, leading to misrepresented conclusions about the hypotheses.
Poor

Data inference in paper and presentation was very weak or non-existent. There were computational errors within the process that caused poor results, leading to little or no conclusions about the hypotheses.
Grade
Paper/Presentation
  Excellent

10 pts

Good

7 pts

Fair

4 pts

Poor

1 pts

Grade

(N/A)

Introduction/Conclusion

Excellent

Introduction and conclusion/reflection were well written.
Good

Introduction and conclusion/reflection were written.
Fair

Introduction and conclusion/reflection were incomplete or not well written.
Poor

Introduction and conclusion/reflection were missing or poorly written.
Grade
Population & Sample

Excellent

Population and sample are clearly stated. The sample size is appropriate and a good representation of the population. The type of random sample is clearly discussed and explained.
Good

Population and sample are stated. The sample size is appropriate and a decent respresentation of the population. The type of random sample is quickly discussed and partially explained.
Fair

Population and sample are stated. The sample size is not appropiate and not a good respresentation of the population. The type of random sample is stated, but not explained.
Poor

No population or sampe is given. Sample size and type of random sample is not discussed.
Grade
Results & Predictions

Excellent

Results are clearly stated and explained. Intelligent predictions are made with the full support of the data results.
Good

Results are stated and partially explained. Predictions are made with little support of the data results.
Fair

Results are stated but not explained. Predictions are made with no support of the data results.
Poor

No results are discussed. No intelligent predictions are made based on the data results.
Grade
Graphs

Excellent

Accurate and very near. Correct z-scores. Includes all labels and characteristics of good graphs.
Good

Accurate and neat. Incorrect z-scores. Missing some labels and some characteristics of good graphs.
Fair

Inaccurate and hard to read. Not based on z-scores. Missing labels and characteristics of good graphs.
Poor

Missing some or all graphs.
Grade



Keywords:
  • statistics, survey, inference, analysis,

Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98