iRubric: Physical Education Group Presentation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Physical Education Group Presentation

Physical Education History Group Presentation

This is for any presentation to the class.Some type of visual needs to be present .

Rubric Code: CX3CCA3

By lapulk

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Physical Ed., Fitness

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate

PE Project Presentation
	Excellent 65 pts	Good 58 pts	Fair 52 pts	Poor 39 pts	Unacceptable 31 pts
Group Presentation 65 pts	Excellent Presentation meets or exceeds all of the presentation expectations. Spelling is correct, there are no typos, citation slide is included Audience able to read presentation slides.	Good Presentation includes images with properly cited information, clearly presented the the historical context, and explanation. Spelling is correct, there are no typos, citation slide is included. Audience able to read presentation slides.	Fair Presentation includes images with factual information, and presented a somewhat satisfactory understanding of the historical context. There are 1 to 2 spelling errors, there are typos, citation slide is included. Audience able to read presentation slides; a lot of text on slides.	Poor Presentation includes images, some citations, and a short paragraph with historical context. There are 3 or more spelling errors; there are typos, citation slide is not included. Audience is not able to read presentation slides; a lot of text on slides.	Unacceptable Presentation includes images presented without either citation or historical context. There are 3 or more spelling errors; there are typos; citation page is not included. Audience is not able to read presentation slides; a lot of text on slides.
Oral Presentation 65 pts	Excellent Presenters meet or exceed all of the presentation criteria. Group members do not read from slides Group understands presentation and is able to speak without aids.	Good Presenters meet most of the presentation criteria, with limited answers to questions and had a good understanding of the content of their presentation. Group members do not read from slides.	Fair Presenters not able to clearly present their material but are able to answer most questions competently and had a basic understanding of the content of their presentation. Group members read from notes - some group members not familiar with presentation.	Poor Presenters are unable to clearly present information and have incomplete answers to questions and had limited understanding of the content of their presentation. Group members read from notes - some group members not familiar with presentation.	Unacceptable Presenters unable to meet presentation criteria and fail to respond to questions and had no understanding of the content of their presentation. Group members read from slides or notes. Group members not familiar with presentation.
Content Competency 65 pts	Excellent Presenters provided ample content based on the chosen topic allowing for student learning and extended knowledge of the topic.	Good Presenters provided sufficient content based on chosen topic allowing for adequate student learning and extended knowledge of the topic.	Fair Presenters provided basic content based on chosen topic allowing for some student learning and extended knowledge of the topic.	Poor Presenters provided limited content based on chosen topic allowing for limited student learning and extended knowledge of the topic.	Unacceptable Presenters provided insufficient content based on chosen topic allowing for little student learning and extended knowledge of the topic.
Creativity 65 pts	Excellent Strong and effective use of creativity in presentation of material, including medium or format, as well as involvement of peers	Good Ample and effective use of creativity in presentation of material, including medium or format, as well as involvement of peers	Fair Some use of creativity in presentation of material, including medium or format, as well as involvement of peers	Poor Little use of creativity in presentation of material, including chosen medium or format, as well as involvement of peers	Unacceptable No use of creativity in presentation of material, including chosen medium or format, as well as involvement of peers
All Parts of Project 65 pts	Excellent Students express mastery of project and presentation: all parts present and completed.	Good Students express a working knowledge of project and presentation: most parts present and completed.	Fair Students express limited knowledge of project and presentation: missing several parts.	Poor Students express limited knowledge of project and presentation: missing most parts.	Unacceptable Students express a poor or vague knowledge of project and presentation: incomplete.

Keywords:

PE, group project, presentation

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric