Skip to main content

iRubric: Functional Sculpture Paper Mache rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Functional Sculpture Paper Mache 
Paper Mache Box
Rubric Code: CX2B52W
By LKB1229
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Arts and Design  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Paper Mache Box
  Excellent

25 pts

Good

22 pts

Fair

18 pts

Poor

10 pts

Criteria

Excellent

All criteria was followed and the jar shape was changed beyond recognition. Creative and thoughtful design.
Good

Most of the criteria was followed. Jar shape changed but still evident. Some creativity in design is evident.
Fair

Some criteria missed. Design predictable and jar shape minimally changed.
Poor

Little to no evidence of following criteria. Jar shape not changed. No thought in design.
Details

Excellent

The paper mache details are unique and well executed. The overall work is visually interesting.
Good

Most of the paper mache
details are creative and executed well. There is some visual interest.
Fair

Most of the paper mache details are easily identified when the paper mache box is seen close-up. Execution is inconsistent and takes away from the visual appeal.
Poor

Design and execution are poorly done and there is no visual appeal.
Attractiveness/Craftsmanship

Excellent

The paper mache shows that the creator took great pride in his/her work. The design and construction look carefully planned. The item is neat (free of unwanted bumps, drips, marks, and tears).
Good

The paper mache shows that the creator took pride in his/her work. The design and construction look planned. The item has a few flaws (unwanted bumps, drips, marks, tears).
Fair

The design and construction were planned. The item has several flaws (unwanted bumps, drips, marks, tears, bubbles), that detract from the overall look. Some spots lack cover.
Poor

The paper mache looks thrown together at the last minute. It appears that little design or planning was done. Craftmanship is poor
Responsible

Excellent

Class time was used wisely. Much time and effort went into the planning and design . There is evidence of thought put in outside of the classroom.
Good

Class time was used wisely. Student could have put in more time and planning at home.
Fair

Class time was not always used wisely, but student was on task most of the time.
Poor

Class time was not used wisely and the student put in no additional effort.



Keywords:
  • Student Name:_________________________________



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n243