Skip to main content
iRubric: Final Project rubric

iRubric: Final Project rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Final Project 
Design a plan for facilitating widespread use of the Illinois (WIDA) English Language Proficiency Standards in mainstream classrooms. This take the form of training for staff with appropriate follow-through to assure sustained implementation or a series of policies/practices that you would recommend be implemented on a building level.
Rubric Code: C2424B2
By nhoraegomez
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Final
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Application

Poor

Hypothesis, problem, or research goals are vague, unfocused, or incomplete.
Fair

Hypothesis, problems, or research goals are minimally stated and/or ambiguous.
Good

Hypothesis, problem statement, or research goals are articulated.
Excellent

Hypothesis, problem statement, or research goals are well articulated. And the plan is easily executable.
Background

Poor

Minimal description of methods or approach. no evidence of understanding the topic
Fair

Methods and approach are stated; absent or inadequate explanation of why methods are appropriate to meet the stated project goals. Little evidence of topic understanding
Good

Methods and approach are described; adequate explanation of why methods are appropriate to meet the stated project
goals. The paper has evidence of topic understanding.
Excellent

Excellent discussion of the methods and approach; exceptional insight and understanding of how they relate to the stated research goals. IClear evidence of mastery of the topic.
Overall organization and writing

Poor

The proposal includes an unacceptable number of grammatical errors; contains formatting errors; fails to cite sources properly; proposal is fragmented and very hard to read; the description does not provide a general picture of the proposed activities; uses too much jargon.
Fair

The proposal includes some grammatical and or formatting errors; the writing style is sometimes difficult to read; descriptions are hard to understand, verbose, or repetitive; use too much jargon.
Good

The proposal includes occasional grammatical and formatting errors; the writing style is easy to follow; the description depicts the project well but uses some jargon.
Excellent

The proposal is free from grammatical and formatting errors; the description is clear, concise, and very easy to follow; it uses appropriate technical and non-technical descriptions as appropriate.
Content

Poor

The proposal has gaps in information and understanding of the topic.
Fair

The proposal has some gaps of information but there is evidence of understanding and knowledge of the topic.
Good

The proposal is well-researched and there are no gaps of information. There is evidence of understanding and knowledge of the topic
Excellent

The proposal is detailed and well-explained. There is clear evidence of the understanding and knowledge of the topic



Keywords:
  • College Level Proposal

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16