- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Social Thinking rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Social Thinking NC Rubric Code: C22XW5B By mbabineau Draft Public Rubric Subject: Communication Type: Assessment Grade Levels: 6-8

Social Thinking
	1 pts	2 pts	3 pts	4 pts
"Reading the Room"	1 In processing school interactions, student identifies five communicative element of facial expression, body language, and gestures and labels an associated intent within acceptable boundaries as judged by the adult.	2 In processing school interactions, student identifies six communicative element of facial expression, body language, and gestures and labels an associated intent within acceptable boundaries as judged by the adult.	3 In processing school interactions, student identifies seven communicative element of facial expression, body language, and gestures and labels an associated intent within acceptable boundaries as judged by the adult.	4 In processing school interactions, student identifies eight communicative element of facial expression, body language, and gestures and labels an associated intent within acceptable boundaries as judged by the adult.
Identifying Relationships	1 Student identifies one possible relationship between conversational partners and explain the environmental and nonverbal communication elements that led him to that conclusion.	2 Student identifies two possible relationship between conversational partners and explain the environmental and nonverbal communication elements that led him to that conclusion.	3 Student identifies three possible relationship between conversational partners and explain the environmental and nonverbal communication elements that led him to that conclusion.	4 Student identifies four possible relationship between conversational partners and explain the environmental and nonverbal communication elements that led him to that conclusion.
Problem Solving / Predict Outcomes	1 Student predicts one viable outcome and determines appropriate action based on the viable outcome.	2 With no more than one cue, student predicts two possible viable outcomes and determines appropriate actions based on one of those outcomes that meets the communicative partner's expectations.	3 Student predicts three viable outcomes and determines appropriate actions based on one of those outcomes that meets the communicative partner's expectations.	4 Student usually predicts four viable outcomes and determines appropriate action that meet the communicative partner's expectations.