iRubric: French City Research Project rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

French City Research Project

Research a French city and provide information on various types of attractions.

Rubric Code: BXW9X3C

By RThayer

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Foreign Languages

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 9-12

French City Project
	Very Poor 1 pts	Poor 2 pts	Fair 3 pts	Good 4 pts	Excellent 5 pts
Completion of task	Very Poor Task was not completed. Poor time management (or had to put back on task 3 times). Poor group working skills.	Poor Project was more than 2 days late or /barely complete. Poor time management, little contributions made to group.	Fair Project was mostly incomplete and/or late (2 days) Time on task was not efficient, contributions to group were few.	Good - Project was mostly complete, but on time -Project was complete, but late (1 class). Time was used wisely, Contributions to group were frequent.	Excellent Project was completed and submitted on time. Time was used wisely. Contributions to group were significant.
Content	Very Poor City is not labelled. No attractions presented.	Poor 3 or less attractions are presented.	Fair City is not labeled and/or 4 attractions presented.	Good City is labeled, 5 attractions presented.	Excellent City is labeled, 6 attractions were presented.
Vocabulary/Grammar	Very Poor Project was entirely in improper English.	Poor The majority of the project was in English.	Fair Some use of English, Very little use of French.	Good Entirely in French, but some grammatical errors.	Excellent Project completed in correct French. No/minimal grammatical mistakes.
Visuals/Aesthetics	Very Poor No use of visuals	Poor Very little use of visuals, no effort shown	Fair Some use of visuals, some effort shown.	Good Majority of attractions were presented with visual. Effort shown, but unorganized ordifficult to read.	Excellent Every attraction was presented with visual, organized, easy to read.
Group Work	Very Poor Did not contribute OR did not work well with others	Poor Poor group work skills.	Fair Showed some responsibility and ability to work well with others.	Good Worked well with others, shared workload.	Excellent Work exceptionally well. Took responsibilty for own work. Contributed equally. Created a group environment that allowed for collaboration and learning.