iRubric: Oral Presentation Rubric- Literary Analysis

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Oral Presentation Rubric- Literary Analysis

Oral Presentation in Spanish

Rubric Code: BXW44BA

By charonea

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Foreign Languages

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

CATEGORY
	Excellent 5 pts	Good 4 pts	Fair 4 pts	Inadequate 2 pts	Poor 1 pts	None 0 pts
Content and Ideas	Excellent Rich and Interesting. Provides in-depth understanding of the literary text and its cultural/linguistic/literary implications. It stays always on the topic and follows the guidelines of literary analysis.	Good Very good. Provided some detail of the literary text and its cultural/linguistic/literary implications. It stays mostly on the topic and follows the guidelines of literary analysis.	Fair Adequate, good. “Elementary” level of understanding of the literary text, not enough information conveyed to the audience about its cultural/linguistic/literary implications. It tries to stay on the topic and follow the guidelines of literary analysis but not always successfully.	Inadequate Weak, missing requirements, vague. It needed more preparation. It did not address the main points of the literary analysis requirements nor the cultural/linguistic/literary implications of the text.	Poor Misleading. No effort to meet requirements.	None None of the requirements met.
Grammar	Excellent Grammar use is correct and shows understanding of the concepts' application.	Good Appropriately uses correct grammar most of the time. At times grammatical errors are detected.	Fair Sometimes appropriately uses correct grammar. Application of certain grammar concepts is lacking.	Inadequate Rarely uses or doesn't appropriately use correct grammar. Rarely uses advanced grammar concepts (indirect/direct object pronouns, Past Tense, irregular verbs, Subjunctive, comparisons).	Poor Grammar application is poor. No proof of clear understanding of several grammar concepts (verb conjugation, adjective/noun agreement, subjunctive, direct/ indirect object pronouns).	None None of the requirements met.
Vocabulary	Excellent Appropriately uses correct vocabulary and grammar. Varied, engaging vocabulary. No English used during the presentation	Good Appropriately uses correct vocabulary and grammar most of the time. At times grammatical errors are detected. Overall appropriate but predictable; no English used during the presentation.	Fair Sometimes appropriately uses correct vocabulary and grammar. Application of certain grammar concepts is lacking. English has been used periodically.	Inadequate Rarely uses or doesn't appropriately use correct vocabulary and grammar. Rarely uses advanced grammar concepts (indirect/direct object pronouns, Past Tense, irregular verbs, Subjunctive, comparisons). English is mixed with Spanish.	Poor Weak, repetitive vocabulary and misuse of dictionary. Grammar application is poor. English is part of the presentation constantly.	None None of the requirements met.
Pronunciation	Excellent Pronounces all words correctly and speaks clearly. Applies pronunciation rules consistently.	Good Pronounces most of the words correctly and speaks clearly. Applies pronunciation rules often.	Fair Speaks clearly but still mispronounces some words. Applies most pronunciation rules.	Inadequate Difficult to understand, is struggling or mispronounces most words.Applies some basic pronunciation rules.	Poor Extremely difficult to understand. Does not apply basic pronunciation rules.	None Little/none of the requirements met.
Spoken Fluency	Excellent Speaks clearly with appropriate pauses and inflection. Very well-rehearsed. No reading from the notes. Excellent eye contact with the audience.	Good Speaks with minor hesitation. Comprehensible to native speaker. May have read from notes from time to time but maintained good eye contact with audience.	Fair Speaks with little hesitation. Comprehensible to the audience. Frequently read from notes maintaining little eye contact with audience.	Inadequate Speaks with some hesitation. Difficult to understand. Mainly reads from paper. Minimum eye contact with the audience.	Poor Speaks with great hesitation. Barely comprehensible and/or read directly from paper. Monotone. No eye contact with the audience.	None None of the requirements met.
Organization	Excellent Excellent organization. Logical and clear introduction, transitions and conclusion.	Good Very good.	Fair Adequate, good.	Inadequate Weak.	Poor Misleading. Missing key elements.	None None of the requirements met.
Guidelines	Excellent All guidelines were followed into detail.	Good All guidelines were followed but into the great detail.	Fair Adequate implementation of the guidelines.	Inadequate Missed most of the guidelines.	Poor Not followed the guidelines, out of topic.	None None of the requirements met.
Handout	Excellent Handout was informative for the audience.	Good Handout was well organized but needed more precise information.	Fair Handout was very general.	Inadequate Handout did not address most of the points presented.	Poor Handout provided with minimum information.	None None of the requirements met.

Subjects:

Foreign Languages

Types:

Discuss this rubric