Skip to main content
iRubric: Biblical Monster Paper-Content/Organization rubric

iRubric: Biblical Monster Paper-Content/Organization rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Biblical Monster Paper-Content/Organization 
World of Narnia Paper-Content/Structure
A 5-paragraph Argumentative paper proving which monster, Jekyll's Hyde or Frankenstein's creation, is consistent with a Biblical view of the nature of man and explaining the consequences of believing in each 'monster'.
Rubric Code: BXA99C5
By KtbudG
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Humanities  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Biblical Monster Paper-Cont/Organiz
  Exemplary

20 pts

Good

17 pts

Fair

14 pts

Poor

10 pts

Introduction

Exemplary

The introduction is engaging and interesting through use of an attention getter and background information. It includes a clear thesis and previews the structure of the paper.
Good

The introduction gives some interesting information about the topic, states a clear thesis and previews the structure of the paper.
Fair

The introduction states the thesis, but does not adequately preview the structure of the paper or give interesting background information about the topic.
Poor

The introduction states the topic with minimal information, does not contain a thesis, or preview the structure of the paper.
Thesis Statement

Exemplary

Thesis is exceptionally clear, focused, interesting and concisely states the paper's purpose in a single sentence.
Good

Thesis clearly states the paper's purpose.
Fair

Thesis is general or inconsistent in focus.
Poor

No thesis is stated or is so unclear as to be confusing.
Content and Focus of Body

Exemplary

Each paragraph has strong, thoughtful supporting details and examples that prove the thesis from beginning to end. Focus is very clear and consistent. Analysis and support for the thesis is taken equally from all 3 books.
Other sources cited add relevant and necessary information to prove thesis.
Good

Each paragraph has specific details supporting the thesis from beginning to end. Focus is mostly clear and consistent. Analysis and support for the thesis is taken from all 3 books but not always equally. Other sources cited are mostly relevant and necessary.
Fair

Each paragraph has general supporting details that develop the thesis. Focus is inconsistent.
Analysis and support for the thesis is taken very unevenly from the 3 books. Other sources cited do not add much to proof of thesis.
Poor

Each paragraph has inadequate or missing supporting details and lacks clarity and focus. Analysis and support for thesis is not taken from all 3 books. Other sources cited are irrelevant to proof of thesis.
Organization and Development

Exemplary

Writer demonstrates logical, consistent and coherent progression of ideas through well-developed paragraphs. Transitions are clear, skillful, and used to enhance organization.
Good

Paragraph development is present but not perfected. Demonstrates consistency and shows some logical progression. Uses clear transitions between paragraphs.
Fair

Organization not fully developed. Shows some attempt at consistency and order. Some attempt at transitions between paragraphs.
Poor

Lack of consistency and order of ideas. Paper shows little or no attempt at transitions between paragraphs.
Conclusion

Exemplary

The conclusion summarizes major points and restates the thesis in an interesting and engaging way.
Good

The conclusion summarizes most points and restates the thesis.
Fair

The conclusion either does not summarize or adequately restate the thesis.
Poor

Missing a summarizing conclusion.
Grade Calculation

Exemplary

Content/Organization of paper

40% of total grade
Good

Mechanics/MLA Format of paper

40% of total grade
Fair

MLA Format Outline

10% of total grade
Poor

MLA Works Cited Page

10% of total grade



Keywords:
  • Biblical Worldview

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98