iRubric: Mid-term Program Evaluation Tool Benefits & limitations rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Mid-term Program Evaluation Tool Benefits & limitations

You have been asked to provide a presentation at a meeting of local government and non-profit administrators. Discuss the specific benefits and limitations of the tool of program evaluation (provide at least 2 benefits and 3 limitations)

Rubric Code: BXA2B46

By lisabarnett101

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Public Administration

Type: Exam

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Question Rubric For extended response.
	Exemplary 3 pts	Proficient 2 pts	Minimal 1 pts	Unsatisfactory 0 pts
Accuracy and Understanding Content The student is able to demonstrate content (factual) knowledge and understanding of material addressed in question.	Exemplary The student shows exemplary understanding of the presented issue(s) by thoroughly and correctly (1) addressing the relevant content, (2)identifying and addressing the key concepts or main ideas, (3) substantiating points with several accurate examples and (4) extensively using correct terminology.	Proficient The student shows understanding of the presented issue(s) by correctly (1) addressing the most critical content, (2) identifying and addressing some of the key concepts or main ideas, (3) substantiating some points with accurate examples, and (4) using some correct terminology.	Minimal The student shows marginal or poor understanding of the presented issue(s) by (1) barely touching on the relevant content, (2) poorly or incorrectly identifying and addressing a key concept or main idea, (3) not substantiating points with relevant or accurate examples, and (4) incorrectly or not using terminology.	Unsatisfactory The student shows no understanding of the presented issue(s) by (1) not addressing or incorrectly addressing the relevant content, (2) not identifying or addressing a key concept or main idea, (3) providing irrelevant or inaccurate unsubstantiated examples and (3) incorrectly using terminology.
Development The student is able to reason with the given task situation.	Exemplary The student expertly:(1) synthesizes material, (2) makes several connections between relevant topics, (3) optimally solves the problem with rationale(s), (4) presents an insightful and thorough evaluation of a situation.	Proficient The student can: (1) synthesize material, (2) make appropriate connections to other topics, (3) provides a possible solution to the problem, (4) present a correct evaluation of a situation.	Minimal Although making an attempt, the student: (1) poorly synthesizes material, (2) makes inappropriate connections to other topics, (3) presents a weak solution to the problem, (5) presents an incorrect evaluation of a situation or.	Unsatisfactory The student does not reason with the assigned materials or solve the given problem.
Required Components The student is able to address each part of the question.	Exemplary Response includes all components and meets or exceeds all requirements indicated in the instructions. Each question is addressed thoroughly. (2 benefits and 3 limitations)	Proficient Response includes all components and meets all requirements indicated in the instructions. Each question or part of the assignment is addressed. (2 benefits and 2 limitations)	Minimal Response is missing some components and/or does not fully meet the requirements indicated in the instructions. Some questions or parts of the assignment are not addressed. (2-3 of a combination of benefits and limitations)	Unsatisfactory Response excludes essential components and/or does not address the requirements indicated in the instructions. Many parts of the assignment are addressed minimally, inadequately, and/or not at all. (less than 2 of a combination of benefits and limitations)
Organization The student is able to create structure, coherence, and unity.	Exemplary Organization is coherent, unified and effective in support of the paper’s purpose and demonstrates effective and appropriate rhetorical transitions between ideas and paragraphs.	Proficient Organization is coherent, unified and effective in support of the paper’s purpose/ plan and usually demonstrates effective and appropriate rhetorical transitions between ideas and paragraphs.	Minimal Organization is coherent and unified overall in support of the essay’s purpose/ plan, but is ineffective at times and may demonstrate abrupt or weak transitions between ideas or paragraphs.	Unsatisfactory Organization is confused and fragmented in support of the essay’s purpose/ plan and demonstrates a lack of structure or coherence that negatively affects readability.
Communication The student communicates with the reader.	Exemplary Ideas are sequenced and logical so that the content is easy to understand. Student is clear, concise and only addresses the assigned task. Material is well organized.	Proficient Student is mostly clear, concise and and only addresses the assigned task so that the content is understandable. Material is fairly well organized.	Minimal Ideas are fragmented, wondering and repetitive, so that it is hard to understand text. Poor or weak ability to express thoughts. Reader must infer intent.	Unsatisfactory Unable to write well enough for scorer to understand answer. Disjointed and incomprehensible thoughts and clauses. No organization.

Keywords:

Essay

Subjects:

Types:

Exam
Writing

Discuss this rubric