- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Broadcast Story Package rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Broadcast Story Package Broadcast Story Package Students will produce a complete broadcast package. (voice-over/soundbites/standup/B-roll Rubric Code: BX9A842 By DPiper Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Journalism Type: Assessment Grade Levels: 9-12

News Story
	4 4 pts	3 3 pts	2 2 pts	1 1 pts
Topic	4 Student(s) properly engage in an interesting topic regarding a school or local issue/event.	3 Student(s) choose an issue or event to cover.	2 Student(s) require ideas to generate a package idea.	1 Topic teacher generated
Organization	4 Information is gathered from multiple electronic non-electronic sources and reliable interviews.	3 Information is gathered from multiple electronic and non-electronic sources and reliable sources, but more information is required.	2 Information is gathered from limited electronic and non-electronic sources and other sources.	1 Little information is gathered from non-electronic or electronic sources only. Interviews don't add to the strength of overall package. Too much teacher input.
Interview Preparation	4 Student(s) generate informed questions and set up appointments.	3 Student(s) generate questions and set up appointments.	2 Student(s) generate questions for interviews or set up appointments, but with some help from the teacher.	1 Questions or appointments are teacher generated.
Script	4 Script is compete, well written and clearly tells the story. Sound bites are introduced smoothly. Stand up statement is strong.	3 Script is complete, tells the story but jumps around a bit. Sound bites introduced but may be incorrectly setup. Stand up relates to story.	2 Script is complete but poorly written and/or Soundbites introduced incorrectly and/or stand up incomplete.	1 Script isn't complete and/or soundbites not introduced and/or stand up not done. Story is disjointed and not well-written.
Shooting Script	4 Shot list is detailed and organized. Students included all the information needed to go out into the field.	3 Shot list generated and completed	2 Shot list was poorly generated and/ is noticeable in the final project.	1 Shot list was poorly generated and/or not followed.
Production
	4 4 pts	3 3 pts	2 2 pts	1 1 pts
Idea	4 Accurately addresses topic and generates viewer interest.	3 Generates interest. Topic addressed well, but some points vague.	2 Describes issue fairly well but does not generate viewer interest, nor are thoughts complete.	1 Does not address issue or topic well . Does not generate interest.
Sequencing	4 Information is in logical, interesting sequence which the viewer can follow.	3 Student(s) present information in logical sequence which the viewer can follow.	2 The viewer has difficulty following work because student jumps around.	1 Sequence of information is difficult to follow.
Interview Setup	4 All W's and H are accurately and logically answered Student(s) generated informed questions and set up appointments.	3 W's and H are accurately and logically answered.	2 Some of the W's and H are asked, but follow-up questions are missing which would have added to the story.	1 Poor questioning and listening skills .
Interview Conducting	4 If needed, both pro and con source evident in final project. Rule of Thirds and composition of subject well-done. Two shot and reverse shot included.	3 Student(s) accurately conduct appropriate interviews of sources. Composition of subject is good. Two shot and reverse shot included.	2 Interviews completed, but not well-done. Composition of subject is fair. Missing reversal and/or two shot.	1 Student(s) conduct interview(s) and/or it is conducted immaturely and inaccurately. Composition of subject is poor. Missing reversal and/ or two shot.
Conventions/Voice over	4 Audio does not have grammatical errors, well-paced. Talent is easily understood.	3 No grammatical errors, but sentence structure distracts the listener.	2 Some grammatical errors. Script structure awkward for the listener.	1 Poorly written and poorly paced.
B-Roll	4 Location shots, composition, choice of visuals add to the package. Camera work is superb.	3 B-roll is good, but shots could have been more varied. Camera work is good.	2 The B-roll and composition is boring and fails to catch viewer's attention. Camera work needs attention.	1 Poor B-roll. Limited effort is obvious in location shots and composition. Poor camera work.
Post-Production
	4 4 pts	3 3 pts	2 2 pts	1 1 pts
Editing	4 Varied shots and crisp editing moves story along. Visually attractive and follows storyline.	3 Visual storytelling good , but the editing could be cleaner.	2 Editing distracts from the story in a few areas.	1 Poorly edited and the viewer is distracted throughout the package.
Effects/Text	4 Effects/Transitions are justified and lower-third text applied to subjects and talent.	3 Effects and lower third text evident.	2 Effects may be overdone and lower thirds not applied where needed.	1 Effects missing or overdone. Limited or no lower third text.
Natural Sound/ Audio Levels	4 Student makes appropriate audio adjustments for voice overs, natural sound and interviewees.	3 Audio adjustments could have been made in the segment, but overall well done.	2 Audio levels are distracting in areas of the package.	1 Audio levels are poorly monitored. This would not be air able.
Story Content
	4 4 pts	3 3 pts	2 2 pts	1 1 pts
Inform & Educate	4 Idea or topic is well-addressed and generates interest.	3 Generates viewer interest.	2 Addresses issue or topic but does not generate viewer interest.	1 Does not describe event or topic well and does not generate viewer interest.
Standup	4 The standup bridges well and is not only creative but adds to the overall appeal of the story. Composition is excellent.	3 The standup is included in the package.	2 The standup does not add to the story and is not scripted well .	1 The standup is either missing or poorly done.
Creativity
	4 4 pts	3 3 pts	2 2 pts	1 1 pts
Artistic Technique	4 Original. Visually engaging. Style compliments and enhances message.	3 Package done well, but lacks artistic elements.	2 Package complete with elements, but falls below expectations.	1 Package incomplete or falls well below expectiations.
Effective Message	4 Story unfolds in a logical and intriguing way. Demonstrates original thinking and careful scripting.	3 Story follows a logical thread and holds interest. - Video reflects script and supports message.	2 Story follows a logical thread but fails to hold interest.	1 Story is disjointed and hard to follow. Information is confusing.
Airability
	4 4 pts	3 3 pts	2 2 pts	1 1 pts
Airability	4 News story is appropriate, visually and technically correct and will be aired.	3 News story is appropriate, visually ready to air but needs technical work.	2 News story lacks in content and needs technical work to be aired.	1 News story is unable to air due to lack of/ or inappropriate content. Technically incomplete.

Keywords:

News Story, Broadcast Journalism

Subjects:

Journalism

Types:

Assessment

Discuss this rubric