Skip to main content
iRubric: Tutoring Project Plan Rubric

iRubric: Tutoring Project Plan Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Tutoring Project Plan Rubric 
Tutoring Project Plan Rubric
This rubric provides an evaluation metric for Tutoring Project Plan.
Rubric Code: BX986W2
By LKissinger
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Powered by iRubric Lesson Plan Evaluation
  Good (3 pts)

The important steps are incorported into the lesson plan and provide clear direction and guidance that will allow another educator to follow the lesson plan.

3 pts

Fair (2 pts)

The steps are included in the lesson plan however data or explaination is vague or incomplete.

2 pts

Poor (1 pt)

There is no effort to include important steps in the development of the lesson plan.

1 pts

Introduction (Section 1)
3 %

The student understands the importance of including proper introduction in the tutoring plan.
Good (3 pts)

Paper provides a thorough description of to the overall lesson, the author, and the tutoring subject.
Fair (2 pts)

Paper provides a cursory description of the overall lesson, the author, and the tutoring subject.
Poor (1 pt)

Paper minimally introduces or does not introduce the overall lesson, the author, and the tutoring subject.
Subject (Section 1)
2 %

The student understands the important of identifying and describing the tutoring subject for the lesson plan.
Good (3 pts)

The description of the tutoring subject(s) (age, knowledge, academic level, etc) is thorough.
Fair (2 pts)

The description of the tutoring subject (age, knowledge, academic level, etc) is incomplete or vague.
Poor (1 pt)

There is minimal or no description of the tutoring subject (age, knowledge, academic level, etc).
Diagnostic Testing
5 %

The student understands the importance of identifying the tutoring subject's language level accurately using the correct tool.
Good (3 pts)

The tool or tools is ideal for the tutoring subject and lesson. A thorough explanation of the rationale, methodology, and purpose for the tool selection is given.
Fair (2 pts)

The diagnostic tool is sufficient, but the description and rationale of the methodology and purpose for the tool is missing or are vague.
Poor (1 pt)

The diagnostic test used is minimally explained, not explained correctly, or does not fit the needs of the tutoring subject.
Tutoring Topics Section
The section below pertains to the tutoring topics section of the paper. Each section under the topics carries the same weight - as indicated by the percentage weight in the rubric.
Introduction
10 %

The student understands the importance of including proper introduction into each lesson.
Good (3 pts)

Paper provides a thorough description of to the specific lesson, the description of the content, and objectives/goals for the session.
Fair (2 pts)

Paper provides a cursory description of to the specific lesson, the description of the content, and objectives/goals for the session.
Poor (1 pt)

Paper minimally introduces or does not provide a description of to the specific lesson, the description of the content, and objectives/goals for the session.
Objectives
10 %

The student understands the importance of adding clear student objectives to each lesson.
Good (3 pts)

Specific learning objectives are listed, and describe what the students will know, understand, value, or be able to do in each lesson.
Fair (2 pts)

The learning objectives are listed but do not reflect what the students will know, understand, value, or be able to do in each lesson.
Poor (1 pt)

There are no objectives or learning goals in each lesson.
Materials
10 %

The student understands that the the role of selecting appropriate materials to support and foster learning.
Good (3 pts)

The paper provides a detailed and thorough explanation of the activities, exercises, and rationale for material choice. It details any changes made to materials.
Fair (2 pts)

The paper provides sufficient explanation of the activities, exercises, and rationale for material choice. There are some vague or unclear elements, and changes made to materials are superficially explained.
Poor (1 pt)

The paper provides minimal explanation of the activities, exercises, and rationale for material choice. Selection of materials is inappropriate and/or minimally explained.
Multisensory Reinforcement
10 %

The student understands the role of multisensory reinforcement in the language classroom
Good (3 pts)

The selection and description of the multisensory reinforcement techniques in each lesson is thorough with references from the assigned readings used to support the author's choices.
Fair (2 pts)

The selection and description of the multisensory reinforcement techniques in each lesson is brief with minimal or no references from the assigned readings used to support the author's choices.
Poor (1 pt)

The selection and description of the multisensory reinforcement techniques in each lesson is minimal with no references from the assigned readings and/or used incorrectly.
Homework
10 %

The student understands how to incorporate homework into the language learning process.
Good (3 pts)

The lesson clearly explains the homework assignments for each lesson. If no homework is given, this decision is thoroughly explained and supported.
Fair (2 pts)

The lesson briefly or superficially the homework assignments for each lesson. If no homework is given, this decision is briefly explain or insufficiently supported.
Poor (1 pt)

The lesson minimally or does not explain the homework assignments for each lesson. If not homework is given, this decision is minimally or not explained.
Assessment & Evaluation Section
Evaluation of Your Subject
10 %

The student understands the role of assessment in the teaching and learning process
Good (3 pts)

Assessment activities are thoroughly described and appropriate for the tutoring plan. Assessment events are incorporated into the tutoring plan and are designed to allow the tutor to accurately measure learning throughout the various stages of the plan.
Fair (2 pts)

Assessment activities are briefly/superficially described; are somewhat appropriate for the tutoring plan. Assessment events are somewhat incorporated into the tutoring plan and are designed to allow the tutor to measure learning at the end of each lesson.
Poor (1 pt)

Assessment activities are minimally or not described; are not appropriate for the plan or lesson. Assessment events are minimally or not incorporated into the lessons and do not allow the tutor to measure learning effectively.
Evaluation of Your Curriculum
10 %

The student understands the role evaluation of the curriculum
Good (3 pts)

The paper provides a thorough and accurate analysis of the methods, tools, and points where curriculum evaluation will occur. It also thoroughly explains how it will use the evaluation data to improve the lesson.
Fair (2 pts)

The paper provides a brief and/or inaccurate analysis of the methods, tools, and points where curriculum evaluation will occur. It briefly explains how it will use the evaluation data to improve the lesson.
Poor (1 pt)

The paper provides a minimal or does not provide an analysis of the methods, tools, and points where curriculum evaluation will occur. It also minimally or does not explain how it will use the evaluation data to improve the lesson.
Reflection
5 %

Good (3 pts)

Paper clearly responds to all prompts with a thorough self-analysis of the development of the project.
Fair (2 pts)

Paper somewhat responds to all prompts with a minimal self-analysis of the development of the project.
Poor (1 pt)

Paper does not respond to all and prompts and/or provides a superficial self-analysis of the development of the project.
Mechanics and Grammar
Mechanics
10 %

The paper follows
standard academic
English writing requirements.
Good (3 pts)

There are no major grammatical errors or typos.
Fair (2 pts)

There are few grammatical errors or
typos. (2-3)
Poor (1 pt)

There are many grammatical errors
and/or typos. (4+)
Organization
5 %

The paper follows
the APA and paper length guidelines.
Good (3 pts)

None to a few APA errors
made; formatting requirements are met
Fair (2 pts)

Some APA errors made;
formatting requirements are met
Poor (1 pt)

Many APA errors made
and/or formatting requirements are not met



Keywords:
  • Lesson plan, Evaluation, CALL


Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98